English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Its like a peanut butter and tuna fish sandwich. There’s nothing wrong with either one seperately, but I don’t recommend mixing them together or you’ll end up with a really bad taste in your mouth. The same can be said of mixing religion and politics. There is no possible way to merge the two without them mutually polluting each other.

So what would you recommend? How do you keep the tuna fish taste (religion) out of politics?

2006-07-05 01:47:13 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

17 answers

As the Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized, it is impossible to keep the two separate.

Which is why we must continually fight to prevent religious organizations, such as the Catholic nation, Baptists or any other group, from gaining undue influence over government agencies.

It is a continual cycle and we are currently in a down cycle in that the US government has come under control of those who would drag the world back to the 1st century.

But, it will change because people do not want to live in the 1st century and will eventually rise up against the Christian Taliban led by the pope, Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson and other narrow minded bigots with their own agenda.

2006-07-05 01:53:42 · answer #1 · answered by Left the building 7 · 2 1

You can take one look at the Pharisees and the Sadducee's and see that Politics and Religion made for quite unpleasant bedfellows or unless they had someone in common to eliminate. That has been the common link through out history - a common enemy. Otherwise, it is almost impossible to find a politician who claims faith who will not sooner or later be corrupted or a faith who claims political involvement that will sooner or later not become disillusioned. That is why morals should be handled by the religion and law should be handled by politics and this worked up until the last forty years without little disturbance for the US - but then came a long a set of citizens who thought morals should be legislated - sorry, but they were wrong - as it led to religion having to become laws and that is wrong, because it was never meant to govern the land, but the soul - and if it had been left alone then we wouldn't need the ACLU - which is a fast track to Communism - which is always the result when religion and politics have tried to historically become bed fellows.

2006-07-05 01:58:19 · answer #2 · answered by dph_40 6 · 0 0

I think that you bring up a good point AND a common assumption. On the surface it looks like there ARE differences between religion and politics, but if you look at the actions of organized religious bodies, you see that in that context at least that religion IS politics...just a different kind. Religions that hold a high number of "thou shalt nots" tend to resemble political parties more than most political parties do, because those commandment lists (Christian and otherwise) aren't anything more than surefire ways of determining who belongs to your party, and who belongs to "the opposition."

Having said that, I must also say that I agree with you wholeheartedly. The political force called politics and the political force called religion are two utterly different forces and they are very dangerous when mixed...not to mention bad tasting. Once you mix the two, even if the taste is agreeable, you wind up with a very deadly situation, one in which disagreement with government becomes an act of blasphemy: that eleminates the free exchange of ideas; it eleminates freedom of self-determination. It allows for a number of forms of discrimination to become "law," and anyone who doesn't discriminate against the theocratically-determined outcasts is suddenly not only a criminal "guilty" of "treason" but also a blasphemer. How sick is that?

But like Frank Herbert stated in his Epic Dune Chronicles: "When religion and politics ride in the same cart, the whirlwind follows."

Oh, and in regard to what I would do. Keep them separate...light years away from each other if possible!

2006-07-05 02:13:02 · answer #3 · answered by chipchinka 3 · 0 0

this is a history question... politics and religion in the ancient times was hand in hand.... if the globalization will finally came to an end I think will find a way to adjust the religions of the Earth in one.... and way not the politics in that....All we have to do it`s to find out what it`s best from what we have and mix it in one big moral politically-religion... I also think in this moment our moral values are so mix up... and we lost our way... also the politics and religion take a no end road to hell... we really need new values of morality... and self confidence... and then will talk about how we mix all the guiding social structure...

2006-07-05 02:04:04 · answer #4 · answered by tofyhan 1 · 0 0

All throughout history anytime religion is mixed with politics it brings persecution and trouble.

Look at these stories: Daniel in the lions den; Daniel and His friends in the fire furnace for not bowing; Nearer to now - the Catholic Church after she got her power from the Roman Empire began to persecute all those who didn't accept her and her beliefs.

Revelation speaks about such a mix that will occur again near the coming of Jesus' second coming.

2006-07-05 01:59:35 · answer #5 · answered by Damian 5 · 0 0

In practice, certain, they blend all too frequently. as an celebration, regulations that forbid or enable issues in protecting with a communities non secular beliefs ought to correctly be imposed on each and absolutely everyone. in countless states at different circumstances, compelling human beings to wish in a unmarried social context or yet another (like college) has been authorised. There also are states with regulations forbidding the sale of alcohol on a Sunday. and many the abortion debate is ruled by using even if a fertilized egg has a soul. The call of God has been integrated into the pledge and on our overseas money. certain, politics and faith are frequently blended to the detriment of society as an finished. yet even as human beings say that they don't blend, they fairly advise to assert that they ought to not blend. That, i believe, is real. that is undesirable adequate that our "majority regulations" way of engaging in politics in this u . s . a . facilitates a majority of idiots to tyrannize anybody else, although the least they could do is furnish us rational and secular causes for regulations and guidelines. that is totally unjustified to inform human beings what to do in protecting with one's non secular beliefs. they don't seem empirically shown, and no one should be forced to settle for some thing that won't be able to be justified with data or reason. The Christians who choose a Christian theocracy in this u . s . a . may sense very different about the completed count number number in the journey that they were outnumbered by using a Muslim majority who needed to placed Christian women human beings in burkas or mandate prayer 5 circumstances an afternoon.

2016-11-01 05:49:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Religion has lost its dignity in action and it is giving place to Spiritualism which must be mixed with all kind of human institutions, it may be politics also.Only a spiritual person can work properly for creating universal brotherhood. A spiritual person is always religious but a religious person may or may not be spiritual.

2006-07-05 02:41:53 · answer #7 · answered by agni 4 · 0 0

Congress shall make NO law respecting an establishment of religion...(meaning) As far as politics is concerned religion does NOT even exist, no religion in government period!
...or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,...(meaning) That you have the right to believe or not believe in anything that you want to and not be persecuted. Further meaning: Do what you want in the privacy of your own home, just don't bring it into the public forum. No special Gawgs or Buybulls please! thank you.

2006-07-05 02:17:06 · answer #8 · answered by chuck b 4 · 0 0

i agree wid u thats so true u said.....but u kno what things are much comlicated in reality as they appear in present day politics politian survive just because they support a particular religion....theres no way out until a general rule is made that no politicians can do the campains based on religion or cannot do the partiallity or wil be out of the politics.......but again its too complicated to impliment

2006-07-05 01:54:04 · answer #9 · answered by r a 1 · 0 0

One time this happened and people were burned at the stake. Religion is a path of spirituality and politics is a path of corruption. Keep them seperate.

2006-07-05 02:10:21 · answer #10 · answered by Sheila 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers