"Terrorism is the war of the poor. War is the terrorism of the rich." Do you agree?

Question

Found this interesting quote on the net by Peter Ustinov.

Though i consider war in all forms to be bad but in defence of the weak, given the way world is unjustly constituted what else is one to think?

Do you have better propositions? Do you still feel partizan about the violence?

Another gem from him:

"Beliefs are what divide people. Doubt unites them."

Answer 1

I understand why Peter Ustinov said it but don't entirely agree with it. Partially yes but terrorism costs money thus the terrorists aren't as poor as claimed or thought as, infact some are the rich and taking from the poor=their lives. Wealth doesn't make one innocent innocence can be found in wealth but terrorists are concealed within the rich and the poor, it's the person that is the terrorist and war is the continuance for rebirth of terrorists

Answer 2

i could not of said it more clearly then that.
this rings so true today and for history.
if we could only live in peace.
socialist is a bad word but how man should live and who said in order to survive you must work .
100 men working toghether can feed thousands and the wealth of any group was determined by the ability for them to obtain food easily and the more effort to find food the less a community was able to produce for its own pleasures.
with all our free time you would think we could figure out that war is a waste unless you consider its true purpose .THAT is to reduce the male poulation of poor men, increase profits for companies that only produce weapons that always seem to be used for offensive purposes under the guise of national security.SOME guys can not get it up unless they are at war so generals need war or viagra (i vote viagra).

Answer 3

Ah Peter Ustinov, rest his soul.

I think the man could have been right in days gone by which is probably where his reflection was at the time he made the statement but dont quote me! However i dont think it is as accuracte nowadays. In fact i would feel more inclined to siding with DC3402 now.

Answer 4

No.Terrorism is the modern alternative to war by countries that have plenty of wealth but are to cowardly to fight directly.Any country that does not take responsibility for its citizens behavior by arresting or killing them for propagating terroism is passively promoting it.
What would America do if there were radical groups that sent individuals to kill citizens of other countries?When you see this happen and it is allowed by or goverment,then you can equate us to them ,and not until.

Answer 5

So all those people in the WTC on 9-11 were poor?

Answer 6

Bullets and bombs for everyone!!! Kill Pu*sy Cat Kill Kill Kill. enough fooling around, lets just kill everybody, you kill you first.here have some bullets.
the sad thing is it all depends on who is reporting, I wonder if the terrorists call themselves terrorists or if they have some other kinder gentler machine gun phrase
no nothing better and no not partisan any more
partisan was another word for terrortist in world war two, the losers of that one called them terrorist

Answer 7

Obama's conflict on women human beings is fairly his conflict on the non secular freedoms of the church homes that do not promote the use of birth control. for sure the biggest non secular team to oppose that is the Catholic Church, they have a lengthy status heritage of educating adversarial to the use of birth control and abortion. even as Obama tried to require the Catholic Church furnish wellbeing insurance that could furnish those amenities he changed into trampling on their first change rights to freely practice their faith. not merely stomp on that freedom bit to rigidity them to modify their teachings. Obama then tried to require attractiveness by using pointing out that those that labored for Catholic depending agencies ought to pay for the extra insurance out of their very own pocket. the difficulty with it quite is that the Church also teaches culpability of sin. in case you enable a sin to be dedicated you're merely as to blame of that sin because the man who dedicated it. many non secular human beings from multiple faiths stood by using the Catholic Church or perhaps as Obama talked about that he replaced his wordings and proclaimed that Republicans were waging a "conflict on women human beings" there are a selection of Catholic women human beings that use birth control, even perchance extra that the Vatican cares to make certain about yet even those that use those do not opt to make certain the authorities replace the teachings of their Church.

Answer 8

100%

Answer 9

i agree to an extent. terrorism is promoted by the rich and executed by the poor.

Answer 10

Agree with all that. Now try getting the Republican conservatives to agree with you.