Was your answer a thumbs up for the human race, or did you go negative? What were your reasons?
2006-07-04 23:36:27 · 11 answers · asked by In Honor of Moja 4 in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
My answer was a thumbs up! The human race is more resilient as a whole as time goes on. We have expanded as is our nature starting from the migratory species we have evolved from. The only place left to explore and expand is space. sorry for the pun but "It doesnt take a rocket scientist to see this"
2006-07-04 23:50:05 · answer #1 · answered by karnovale 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
neither.we all hope to see makind survive through the next 100 years.we also know some of the obstacles for that happening.our information right now is just too limited to give a thumbs up or down.we dont know if there are unsees dangers or pleasent surprises
all we can do is try to find every possible threat,work to counter it and hope that future generations will do the same
2006-07-04 23:47:11 · answer #2 · answered by sharath1186 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither a thumbs up or thumbs down because it is up to all the human race to take power into their own hands and not to listen to those that are in power telling us what to say
2006-07-04 23:41:37 · answer #3 · answered by Gizmo 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it quite is an elementary one. If the international gets too warm, we've shown that we are able to proceed to exist it by way of fact the "Cradles of Civilization" have been in warm, dry factors. If the international gets chilly, then we've already shown that we are able to stand up to ice a protracted time, and that's with none "severe" technologies. If the international gets overpopulated, it is going to, out of necessity, stability itself out. i do no longer think of we'd desire to rigidity approximately surviving the subsequent one hundred years. the genuine question is the thank you to we keep the subsequent one hundred years from turning out to be to be the subsequent dark Age.
2016-12-10 04:47:14 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course the human race will survive.However individuals will continue to die,every moment of every day.In the midst of life,there is death and in the midst of death,there will be new life. Mine is a lot closer to the use by date than it used to be,but I am hoping to stay around as long as possible and so are most members of the human race.
2006-07-04 23:59:16 · answer #5 · answered by mystic_master3 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The human race would survive. But at the cost of other creatures or things that can not be regained. So I guess my answer was more of a mumbled "yes".
2006-07-04 23:46:04 · answer #6 · answered by kelpie_tamer 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I didn't go one way or the other. If pressed, though, I'd posit that the societal, economic and cultural changes required for us to see in the year 2106 in our present form are too great to change in the given time.
In short, I reckon it'll be "life, Jim, but not as we know it."
2006-07-04 23:49:17 · answer #7 · answered by amusedbystander 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm negative. People are so much deluded of their role in the universe.
2006-07-05 00:32:10 · answer #8 · answered by Brutal Russian 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I didn't answer..I think it's a rather stupid question.. I mean..who knows what will happen (a large meteor could crush down tomorrow) and who even cares..we'll be dead anyway
2006-07-04 23:47:53 · answer #9 · answered by tejci 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i was postive and negative we can not mess with other people's lives we are not god.
2006-07-04 23:39:55 · answer #10 · answered by h6sf3 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋