Why Iraq and not Iran or North Korea?

Question

America said Iraq posed an immeninent threat to the U.S. because it had "Weapons of Mass Destruction" which Saddam Hussein denied, and which turned out to be true. There were no WMD.
At that same time N. Korea was saying it had nuclear weapons or was working on them.

Now Iran is saying it will not stop Enriching Uranium, and North Korea just fired 7 MISSLES!!! into the ocean. One that was capable of reaching U.S. soil.

BUT WE DON'T ATTACH THEM?!?!? Why the hell not? The double standard and hypocrisy is mind blowing.

Please explain.

Answer 1

Albert Einstein said, when told that the us had dropped the bomb on Hiroshima and that over 100, 000 men women and children were killed, that he did know what weapons would be used in the 3rd world war, but he did know that weapons in the 4
world war, would be sticks and stones.

Answer 2

Actually the most important reason to be in Iraq is to establish a democracy in the heart of the middle east, which has ALWAYS been the position of the Bush administration. Whether or not Iraq had WMDs is still in dispute (some were actually found and some reports say more were moved into Syria).

There is no double standard. Your logic dictates that if we can't stop all crime then we shouldn't stop any crime?

I suspect that you are simply an antiwar peacenik, using a phony argument to hide behind. Please explain.

(Most of you people are so ignorant I want to vomit)

Answer 3

Iraq was the easier country to take oil from (Its not just oil alone, otherwise we would have gone into Iran, it has more oil than Saudi Arabia, or close to).

Answer 4

2 reasons:
1. Oil
2. W had to go in and finish what his father was incapable of with Desert Storm.

Answer 5

The bush family was busy tracking down seceret gas recipe.
Ha Ha.
Now they sold their people out and we all pay for thier treasure hunt.

Answer 6

Oil...plain and simple.

Answer 7

**** YOU.