No!
2006-07-04 21:10:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I am an Indian cricket fan and I say, "Enough! Stop this constant prosecution and persecution of Murali." He has been put through so many tests. He does not chuck and is truly a great bowler.
2006-07-04 21:51:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Neeraj 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO..he has a slightly bent arm from birth.. so the naked eye sees as his arm is being bent while delivering the ball..
he's a great bowler and even umpire Darryl Hair also agrees that his action is leagal after all the tests pointed out that Murali is clean..
2006-07-05 02:00:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by ela_kollek 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The guidelines of the game were written even as all we had to bypass on become the human eye. that's truly probably that many tremendous bowlers of the previous chucked to a much better or lesser degree - that is, their hands straightened fractionally interior the act of shipping. Now; if a bowler straightens his arm by using, say, 5 degrees as he bowls - a million) He probably doesn't understand he's doing it, 2) The earnings he receives will be negligable, and three) No-one will observe. a minimal of, no-one will observe with the bare eye. With tremendous-sluggish-action cameras even if, you could spot the minutest quantity of straightening; and in case you outlaw it completely, then an undesirable lot of bowlers will be ejected from the game. The powers that be, subsequently, have taken the purely direction open to them, and stated that a level of tolerance will be allowed. There have continually been chucking controversies. One become Harold Rhodes, the Derbyshire seamer. His action become seen as suspect, yet on study it become got here upon that he had hyperextension. that is, even as he completely "straightened" his arm, it actual bent slightly any opposite direction. As for Murali - he's yet another with a actual oddity in that he can swivel his wrist by skill of 360 degrees (almost about actual oddities, the full Indian spinner Chandrasekhar suffered from polio as a baby which left him with a withered accurate arm which become truly versatile and acceptable for bowling leg-spin. even as fielding he threw inclusive of his left arm), which makes his action seem complication-free. even if that's going to be recognized as legal is perhaps borderline - even if that is six hundred wickets too late to do something about it now. I do discover it exciting that the loudest voice condemning Murali comes from Bishen Bedi (whose own action, I keep in mind, once got here lower than close scrutiny) - a sprint of bitter grapes?
2016-10-14 03:30:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Murali is a chucker. Sorry, Murali fans.
2006-07-05 03:57:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by isaiah36 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hell No.
Get a life J4P. Dont just abuse worldclass player just because you cant see him performing well and breaking records.
2006-07-08 21:26:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by countmeone 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Definetely chucker when it was testing they bowls clear bowling even kapugedere was best of all chuckers see his bowling action
2006-07-06 00:17:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by JJ 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, he's a geniune bowler with a legal action
2006-07-05 07:41:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by SpideR 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
definitely no, also it depends on the country your living, if you an Australian or an English fan you would say yes
2006-07-04 21:27:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by nickel 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
no
2006-07-10 01:50:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by lionheart 1
·
0⤊
0⤋