not bad ... but giving up Delhomme was not a good move. Bulger may have Holt, but it is not always a great idea to have the QB and #1 WR from the same team on your roster. Furthermore, Delhomme just had Keyshawn Johnson added to the WR corps to complement Steve Smith (adding another solid catching option) as well as DeAngelo Williams from the draft (he can run and makes a great dump-off or short yardage option). Also, Delhomme is not as "fragile" as Bulger is, so durability is another issue that needs to be addressed when looking at QBs.
Very strong backfield with Johnson and Jordan, and Tony is always solid at TE. Fitzgerald and Holt as your 1-2 WR combo is lethal. Kasay is decent and the NYG D/ST can add some points. Since I don't know who was available during your selections, I can't really criticize your choices.
Not bad ... but what about your bench players as well ... they are just as important as your active players.
2006-07-04 19:14:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by icehoundxx 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It would be great to know your bench, as I agree with other posters...if Bulger or L.Johnson were to go down your team would have a much different feel...
QB: Unlike some of the others, I think he will have a great year. I think the trade was decent, you got Holt, who I put in the top 5 of fantasy WR, and Bulger, who could end up in the top 6-7 of fantasy QB's. I hope you can get (or have) a decent backup, however, considering he is coming off injury. Grade: INC (B for Bulger, INC because I don't know who your backup is)
WR: While I won't say Fitzgerald and Holt are "lethal" you do have a great combo there. Who is your #3? And who are your bench players? Again, bench is critical especially if someone gets hurt. Hopefully (in your case) Fitzgerald gets the majority of the TD's instead of Boldin, it's a real toss-up. Grade: INC (B+ for Fitz/Holt, INC again, don't know your bench
RB: Love your combo of Jordan/Johnson. One of the best I have seen. You could have the potential for 35 TD's between both of them. Alas, without knowing their backups, hard to assign a grade here. If L.Johnson was to go down and your backup was R.Droughens, you'd take a major hit. Grade: INC for overall, A+ for L.Johnson/Jordan
TE: Gonzalez is still one of the best, but I prefer Heap in this situation (if you could have got him). With you already having L.Johnson, you'll lose both these guys in week 5 I believe, and that will hurt your chances to win. Grade: B
K: Kasey is OK, but I think he's in the bottom half of the top 10. Kickers vary so widely though, who knows what might happen. Grade: B
DEF: You know, I disagree with the Giants DEF being all that great. I would take a Minnesota/Jacksonville/Washington before the Giants. The Cowboys and Redskins will air it out on them, and I think Philly can beat them both ways. Their defense got manhandled by Carolina, and I think they are getting old in a hurry. If I were you, I'd look for a least a good back-up. Otherwise, I think you might be in trouble with this one. Grade: C
Overall, you will contend, so long as your starting lineup stays healthy. But if even one person gets hurt (especially L.Johnson or Bulger), I think you will be in real trouble without knowing your bench.
Overall Grade: B-, due to uncertainty about your bench players.
2006-07-05 21:44:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by JoeRevs300 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, you have a very good team. LJ and Lamont Jordan are 2 of the top 10 fantasy backs. Larry Fitzgerald and Torry Holt are 2 of the top 15 fantasy Wide Receivers. Tony G is always a good TE. NYG defense will be very good. Mark Bulger throws alot of INT's and is injury prone, but still throws touchdowns. You will be a contender
2006-07-05 15:45:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by sm_csu 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Should have kept delhomme, he is possibly the most underrated player in the league. Bulgar is oft injured on a decling team with aging weapons. Holt is an aging weapon. Love you RB's, TE is good, K fine, defense is a question. On your D remember that the giant defense may be above average but the division they play in is stacked on offense this year. They could get scored upon quite a bit.
2006-07-05 09:23:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Veleno45 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with the previous poster, in a ten team league, the season is usually won in the later rounds, because they are so many options available for backups.
Personally I don't like Bulger this year as in years past. Mike Martz is no longer there, and he showed a bit of fragility last year with nagging shoulder problems.
I would have kept Delhomme over Bulger personally....and yes I know football.....Love your WR's and RB's though, defintely a strength.
Should be okay as long as you have some depth at QB....
2006-07-05 05:27:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dave D 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not that good, I take it your RB’s where your first pick. You need some more help there hast to be some help available in free agency. You need some help in the WR department.
2006-07-05 12:12:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dallas P 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
trade the qb and holt
2006-07-05 02:04:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Detroit fan stuck in California 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
YOUR RIGHT.....theirs nothing wrong with your except.....
your defense.........the Giants were one of the easiest to pass against last year..........but more than likely you can still grab a so-so def still...to play against weaker teams.........
Good luck......your team looks fine
2006-07-11 00:31:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think RB strength is key and u got a pretty damn good combo rigt there , u should b fine, nice team.
2006-07-05 07:54:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Matt P 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not perfect?
2006-07-05 02:03:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by khan a 4
·
0⤊
0⤋