How could someone be offended by religion but be totally ok with crime, violence, porn, promiscuity and racism? Pseudos claim not to be racist and intolerant but they really are, and when it comes to their vision of "tolerance", they don't know where to draw the line. There's things you should tolerate (different cultures, races, religions etc) and then there's things you obviously shouldn't (immoral things). And pseudos seem to only tolerate the bad things. Their code words for immorality are "freedom" and "liberation". Their code word for racism and patronizing minorities is "political correctness". They have this false idea that it's ok to do bad things that only hurt yourself as long as they don't hurt other people, but the truth is, things that appear to only hurt yourself also indirectly harm other people-there's such a thing as external costs. Pseudolib is still very prevalent in our society whether people admit it or not, and it's turned our country into 1984/Brave New World.
2006-07-04
18:26:04
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Truth, I hate that guy. Did you read my answer to him? There's jerky conservatives too obviously. And I said "psuedoliberals". But I'm not a conservative, wanting to fix moral decay in our country wouldn't make me conservative, it would make me progressive.
2006-07-04
18:52:26 ·
update #1
And racism is NOT a Christian virtue, as you can see, that guy's not a real Christian.
2006-07-04
18:53:26 ·
update #2
I certainly wasn't applying that to all liberals. And I didn't even say liberal. I said PSUEDOliberal, because obviously they are not real liberals, they are no less narrow than the other extreme.
2006-07-04
19:24:12 ·
update #3