It seems that Canada's laisez faire attitude towards all things progressive because "we don't want to hurt people's feelings" is at the forefront of denying common family values. Where else in the world are basic child rights denied by special interest groups backed by feminist groups. We had a government study recommending counselling, children's lawyers, and mandatory joint custody unless proof was giving of unfit parenting...it didn't see the light of day due to certain special interest groups. All the recommendations were proven the world over...in Canada they got swept under the carpet. Meanwhile children are ripped away from deserving wonderful fathers, and false accusations of rape, pedophilia, and abuse(child or spousal)are used as weapons against innocent men. In the same breath, abused men are laughed at...because it's not women who are abusers. The most abusive relationships statistically are lesbian relationships....how's that for destroying the men are abusers myth.
2006-07-04 17:18:39 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Gender Studies
That's too much to read...can I just have my points please?
2006-07-04 17:28:02 · answer #1 · answered by euphoriarevelation 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Both genders are abusive; men are just more physical. There can be abuse in hetro- and homosexual relationships.
As for making hetrosexual marriage extinct, I don't believe so. They will probably always make up a good percentage of the population, and they want to be with who they love. That's all we, as homosexuals, want to have as well.
Feminism is a little, let's say, extreme at times. They do put down men a lot, and I wish they didn't; it makes me sad to call myself a feminist. I don't want the men to be hurt in the process, even if I am a lesbian. After all, I have two brothers and many good guy friends.
The false accusations are a part of what hating divorcees do to each other. I don't see why... But sometimes it's true. It does not help that society doesn't see women abusers. In this same breath, I also will say I don't believe that the most abusive relationships statistically are lesbian relationships, although there are some out there. Again, it's just like with hetrosexual abusive relationships; there are women abusers, and men abusers.
Perhaps, the best way to solve such a problem is to try and create more resources for abused men, and teach the next generation that men can be abused as well, and it's just as serious. = )
2006-07-04 21:52:28 · answer #2 · answered by Kage D, 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
when men and women stop marrying then it will stop.
I don't agree with gay men adopting children.
Science and gay rights don't influence a man and a women's relationship at all.
I support gay marriage though, mainly because Its none of my business and it on its own doesn't hurt anyone.
As for feminism?
Women needed to win back an equal voice in the community and although it can go to far at times, eventually it will all level out.
There wont ever be enough Lesbians to shove heterosexuality out the door. Too many women love mans little roger....
2006-07-04 18:15:15 · answer #3 · answered by The Magical Healer 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What homosexuals couples are stressful would not even exist, to make it exist you should redefined marriage, striping away the traditional public purpose of marriage. This consequences all and diverse because the hot criminal definition applies to all and diverse. the traditional public purpose of marriage is to connect toddlers to their organic and organic father and mom. no one has the right to have a baby, because toddlers are their personal persons with rights of their personal. they are not products. If we seem at marriage from the youngster's standpoint not each and every marriage has toddlers yet each and every baby has father and mom and each and every baby is entitled to a courting with both father and mom. Adults could seem after this precise because the youngster can not probably seem after it themselves. If love replaced into the in straightforward words significant ingredient, we'd want to anticipate step father and mom to be interchangeable with organic and organic father and mom, which all of us understand they are not. adult males and ladies persons are literally not interchangeable it really is a organic and organic actuality. also, analyze have shown the absence of a father negatively impacts a baby's existence. human beings don't like listening to that yet part of the duty of being an man or woman is to placed the needs of the subsequent era previously our own selfish needs and needs. this suggests adults have a duty to guard the rights of the youngster. Now thats now to not say there can not or should not be criminal protections and popularity of their dedication yet could or not it really is defined or said as marriage? No, truly it shouldn't because they are not a similar and is merely not a similar no count number how a lot everyone want it to be so. merely placed the relationships are literally not a similar and may not be defined as if they were. All that would want to do is confuse human beings and tell them a lie.
2016-11-05 21:48:32 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I live in Canada and it does get pretty silly up here, sometimes. But, no, heterosexual marriage will always prevail. I don't agree with gay/lesbian couples raising children. But, that still doesn't interfere with heteros having kids and raising them as they see fit. I'm not anti-gay. I just think kids need both a father and a mother, a stable home life, etc.. And then when they get to be adults they STILL blame their parents for "messing" them up. LOL.
2006-07-11 12:29:16 · answer #5 · answered by D M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so, at least not for a very long time. There are still a lot of women (even feminists--and I know a lot) who still want to get married. Heterosexual marriage will change (and has already changed) as the view of women changes.
2006-07-04 17:24:19 · answer #6 · answered by q2003 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Science, gay rights, and feminism have had and will continue to have no impact at all on heterosexual marriage. What a lot of crap. If you're so worried about the demise of heterosexual marriage, you should focus less on the rational, gay and feminist, and more on outlawing divorce.
2006-07-04 20:47:08 · answer #7 · answered by eljonez 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I hope not, I like men only in term of intimacy, dating and marriage. I don't think the world is being taken over by gay people. They're still only about 10% of the total population.
2006-07-04 17:53:10 · answer #8 · answered by Brea 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know are you saying now that it's come up as an issue you want to divorce and become a gay man? Which way does your panic run?
2006-07-05 05:56:09 · answer #9 · answered by rbsb1999 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Heterosexual marriage has survived everything else in the world. I don't think it's going to go away.
2006-07-04 17:25:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
your such a freaking bible banging republican. your such a stereotypical loser who follows that retard in the white house around.
you need to except that people do have rights and that we are not living in a world where the roman Catholic church rules.
so stop being so discriminating and calm down.
2006-07-04 17:24:33 · answer #11 · answered by ipeemountiandew 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋