English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The question's no fun if you don't say why.

2006-07-04 16:59:32 · 98 answers · asked by Z, unnecessary letter 5 in Society & Culture Mythology & Folklore

Sorry for mistyping the word "you".

2006-07-04 17:19:12 · update #1

98 answers

I would think a zombie, why because I know the secret of killing a zombie (watched resident evil and mastered the game)...lol The head has to come off.. good question

2006-07-16 18:40:49 · answer #1 · answered by trouble comes a knockin 5 · 1 3

A zombie. Here's my reasoning:

A vampire can appear in multiple forms and is too difficult to identify. So they can sneak up on you, and they can fly, which werewolves can't. Also, a vampire can come out anytime they want. A werewolf can only appear on the full moon. Finally, to kill a vampire you have to drive a stake through its heart (and get up close). You can kill a werewolf from a distance with a silver bullet. So I would much rather be up against a werewolf than a vampire. But a zombie is a much better choice for an enemy.

Zombies are not very bright, and have a general lack of organization. Zombies are most effective in a mob; they make up for their incoherence with sheer numbers. A single zombie doesn't pose much of a threat. Also, werewolves are fast and can chase you down. A zombie is pretty slow. Unless they can surround you on all sides, zombies don't make very good predators. Just don't let them get very close, have a powerful piece of artillery, and you're pretty well safe.

I hope you take this into account the next time you're deciding which undead creature to go up against.

2006-07-04 17:08:33 · answer #2 · answered by I Know Nuttin 5 · 0 0

It depends on what point in my life I'm at. I am a cosmetologist pursuing a law degree- when I get to the point where I AM a lawyer I would take on any of them purely because of:
Professional Courtesy
Vampires(Lawyers) suck money out of the werewolf(client) that screwed up and now both are trying to convince a bunch of zombies(the jury) that the werewolf is just a sweet puppy.
My job would involve all so I would probably know how to deal with them all. Like I said- with the vampire, as a fellow vamp I would not be under attack as a professional courtesy. I would already know how to manipulate the werewolf as I did all my werewolves and the zombie is just another sheeplike creature that can be turned and twisted in any direction.
I am kidding about all of this as I don't think ALL lawyers, clients, and juries are like this. I'm just ridiculing the stereotypes. And I really am pursuing law (well- it could change).

2006-07-18 19:20:19 · answer #3 · answered by MorningGlory's Girl 2 · 0 0

Definitely a zombie. No brain except the one they want from you, walking like a drunken sailor, so you are certainly faster then they are. One good slam to the head and your done, and if you are really creative one good slice and you have your own live zombie soccer head.

Vampires always burn up in the sun or turn to dust when you drive a steak through them, either way you have a pile of dirt, I suppose you can add water and maybe get some play dough out of it.

Werewolf what can I say, all that's left is a naked guy or gal, dead. So if your into necromancy you got your next date. Not to mention, vampires, werewolves; stronger, faster, change shapes, and probably smarter then your average human, that is why I would prefer to go up against a Zombie.

2006-07-16 13:55:32 · answer #4 · answered by BRY1970 2 · 0 0

What kind of zombie are you talking about? Are you talking about the typical zombie that is stupid and can't run? What meathod of killing said zombie are you thinking, because one folklore book told me you have to feed them salt to remind them they are dead to kill them, but most people say it's a headshot that kills them. And how fresh is the zombie? Is it rotting already, or just died? If you gave me one of the easy-to-kill zombies then definately one of those. If you gave me a regular zombie, then one of those. If you gave me a zombie that is super strong, fast and agile then not one of those. Usually people think of them as the first two and when presented with zombies as a threat, their strength is in numbers. But if it was a super zombie then I'd want to take on a werewolf because werewolves are originally thought of a cursed innocents and I'd want to free them from their curse. Also they are just big wolves who are focused on killing. They aren't really supposed to be these anthro-wolves everyone pictures them as these days. Just a silver bullet to the chest when it's charging me, then get out of the way as it falls so it doesn't fall on me. Even if you didn't give me a gun, it's not that hard to break a wolve legs or something, just have to get past the whole biting and clawing you, then once it's on you, just bend it's front legs back. Then you could run away.
Oh, and people who say they'd want to go up against a vampire because they wouldn't mind being one make no sense. Being a vampire tortures the soul and all you care for, all you want and dream about is blood. Vampires are monsters and it tortures them to be that way. You people need to read Dracula and stop reading those dark romance books like Twilight.

2006-07-15 04:13:16 · answer #5 · answered by Some Guy 2 · 0 0

A Werewolf would be easy. Borrow the Lone Ranger's Revolver.
A Zombie walks like my "X".
For a vampire, eat lots of garlic and keep belching.

2006-07-18 23:09:55 · answer #6 · answered by ROBERT M 2 · 0 0

The easiest would be a zombie because all you would have to do is cut off his/her head. They are slow moving and just want to feed.

A vampire on the other hand can move quicker than the human body, can disapear, can change forms and use mind control.

A werewolf is like fighting a bear. Just don't do it!

2006-07-16 18:01:23 · answer #7 · answered by walking2health 3 · 0 0

ok well it all depends. first of all definately not a werewolf cuz i don't know i just don't really like them. Second maybe a vampire cuz then maybe i could become one if i don't die. third. Well a zombie it would really depend. would it be a slow zombie? or would it be fast? cuz in movies they are slow and then in other movies they are fast. But if it was a slow zombie i would rather go up against it then anything else. Cuz then it is slow and im faster i could either run or just defeat it easier. What about you?

2006-07-04 19:15:20 · answer #8 · answered by I Luv Joel Madden!! 6 · 0 0

If I saw a zombie I would faint.
Same with the werewolf.
I might stand more of a chance with a Vampire...
Seeing as how I would be able to run.
If by some chance I didn't faint I could out run a zombie.

Really, I think I'd be dead in all three situations.

2006-07-04 17:09:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

None of these exists but I am sure practical is not the chosen aspect of your question so here goes.... A werewolf. I can shoot it. it dies. no way a zombie.. they may be slow but they will continue to follow you.. since they don't need sleep while you're taking a much needed nappy there they are breaking in again. to kill it I would have to be close proximity to it (and I hate bad smelling things) to hack it apart with a machete. although close range a sawed off shotgun with buckshot might blast enough holes to make it immobile. A vampire.. another close up ordeal with the stake. although they don't stink they will sneak up on you and I don't like to be frightened and especially overpowered. I do like being bitten though... but I wouldn't like that bite.

2006-07-04 17:18:05 · answer #10 · answered by xwordxclr 2 · 0 0

a zombie because if the body is fresh regamoris will set in and that lasts for a couple of minutes then when their body stops this process if the zombie does run after you its muscles will rip because no blood or oxygen will keep the muscles flexible so it would be a short jog to escape because all over the muscless will rip with in 1 hour give or take depending on the muslce structure and body type and if the zombie is not fresh his muscles are partially decaded anyways

2006-07-15 22:23:11 · answer #11 · answered by tigermuffin03 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers