How can you be pro choice but not be for legalization of pot?

Question

Pro choice is basically you doing what you want with your body.... it applies to drugs, sex, pot WHATEVER!!!! get a mind!

Excuse me, I saw a couple of minds out there,.... thanks!!!!

Answer 1

I do believe in the legalization of pot, so being pro choice to me would be a very open minded party. I also like Amsterdam believe that we should set up red light districts and support prostitution as a profession. Strippers are allowed,we all I am sure know of a gentleman's massage parlors, like come on we are the new world. Gays should have the right to Wed.Well just wanted to leave my opinions on pro choice and what a good polices to me would be.

Answer 2

Somehow I am not getting the co-relation between the two issues.
Hmm ... must be because there isn't any!

(BTW .. I am pro-life (but support the pro-choice laws); and I am also for legalizing pot ... not because I use it, either. As long as I was here, figured I might as well state the views)

Answer 3

Hey now, i will be the first one to say it. I smoked pot heavy foro 5 years of my life, it messed me up. I did better at school and work, but i lost my family and the love of my life, but i stoped after 5 monthes of trying to quite. I am pro choice, and I would love for pot to be legalized, but they are very different issues, and besides pot wont be leagalized any time soon, because all my pot head friends would be way to high to care to go vote, and also do you want to government to tax your weed and end up paying $12.34 for a dime? Hell no.

Answer 4

Those are two entirely different things, UNLESS your sole rationale is that both have something to do with determining what one does with ones own body.

Now me, personally: I don't like to see folks doing pot. But I think that it should be legalized, because it isn't all that terrible (really, no worse than alcohol--which is pretty bad stuff, yet is perfectly legal). And having it be illegal gives criminals a lot of money (which is what happened back during prohibition).

Answer 5

They're two completely different issues. What are you thinking? I'm pro-choice and not for the legalization of marijuana... I think women should have the right to choose what they want to do with their bodies, but I don't think that we need another drug legalized that is ultimately unhealthy for people. I'm not getting your logic here...

Answer 6

Pro choice is the right to decide to have an abortion or not.
Legalization of pot is entirely different.

Answer 7

Um, because pot has nothing to do with my uterus. I do believe pot should be legalized however, though the two beliefs aren't even remotely related. It'd be like me saying, you want to have a say about your boy parts, how can you not be for gun control? Sounds weird when I phrase it like that, doesn't it? :)

Answer 8

i'm professional-selection on non secular grounds. Religions exist that say that existence starts at delivery, at separation of the umbilicus, or on first breath. (3 separate non secular denominations, a minimum of.) To declare an in the previous reduce for abortion is to disclaim freedom of religion to those adherents of their previous due-existence faith. i'm in desire of legalization of each and every of the significant leisure drugs, yet we placed a tax stamp on them. it really is because I undergo in options analyzing my history books. What got here about in the course of the time of Prohibition made millionaires out of alcohol smugglers. We as a united states of america were unable to quit eating. yet through legalizing it and putting a tax stamp on each and every purchase, we grew to develop into extra able to administration it. That frame of mind would also provide us grounds to finish high quality controls checks to weed out the undesirable weed (pardon the pun), as well because it would enable the IRS to bypass after the adult males who received't pay the taxes. As a lot money as we spend on the leisure stuff - sniffing, snorting, smoking, capturing up, etc. - and as undesirable as our economic equipment is at present, legalization + taxation would provide us some intensive reward: a million. extra federal earnings (from the tax stamps) to help shrink the debt load. 2. employ human beings in a sparkling criminal organization - we'd want to favor farm exertions, accountants, high quality controls techs, sales human beings, advertisers, shippers, etc. 3. Empty out the jails of penny-ante crooks 4. shrink the load on our courts 5. enable us to spotlight extra urgent complications. Now, there would nonetheless be the topics of attempting to electrify persons with the duty of not utilising or in the different case going out in public at the same time as stoned brainless. "utilising less than the effect" and different public infractions are literally not forgivable no matter if the medication themselves are or or not legalized. yet a minimum of less than that type of frame of mind, you should do 2 stupid issues to bypass to penitentiary. (Toke and stress.)

Answer 9

Just like pro-aborts can be for killing babies but for saving the lives of serial killers from the death penalty! THEY DON'T WORK ON LOGIC!!! THEY ARE LIBS!!

Answer 10

You have been smoking it haven't you? Because I have never and therefore I don't readily see the connection between the two issues.