2006-07-04 15:36:36 · 11 answers · asked by I love the cake 2 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ FIFA World Cup (TM)
I don't know. But after the shoot outs with Argentina, Lehman showed a lot more confidence against Italy (If the game would have went into PKs Germany would have won).
2006-07-04 15:41:33 · answer #1 · answered by saltinecracker09 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kahn wouldn't have had any more luck in saving those shots than Lehman did. They were both just great shots. ...Plus Lehman did a great job throughout the game of coming out to get crosses and attcking players. Kahn may not have fared as well in those situations.
2006-07-04 23:16:12 · answer #2 · answered by Otis T 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe.
i like oliver kahn but i have to admit that lehman also playerd well and the italiens shots was too good. if germany had changed the defending to better defending, then they might have won
2006-07-04 22:46:08 · answer #3 · answered by The One 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no the outcome wouldnt have been different but kahn is better than lenmann. it never looked like germany were goin 2 get pass buffon.
2006-07-04 23:36:59 · answer #4 · answered by rooney8 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. It was the extensions that worned out German players, not decision of Klinsman. At least I think not.
2006-07-04 23:00:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. The game was great, both sides having chances to win in regular time. I think the Italians had more juice left when the going got tough.
2006-07-04 22:39:27 · answer #6 · answered by bilskine 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah i reckon because oliver kahn is experienced in world cups. and he is better than Lehmann. Lehmann sux
2006-07-04 23:06:02 · answer #7 · answered by poiuytrewqasdfghjklmnbcx 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah - it would have been about 4-0!!
2006-07-04 22:44:42 · answer #8 · answered by Johnny Baggs 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Grosso's goal could not have been placed better by more than an inch.
2006-07-04 22:40:11 · answer #9 · answered by Joga Bonito 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who knows?
Maybe ...
2006-07-04 22:38:33 · answer #10 · answered by il divo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋