Would you, from a male perspective,support Anti-Pornography Laws and how do you define pornography?
2006-07-04 15:15:27 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Porn to me is Hardcore stuff. Just nudity is not porn. I have no problems with porn. Its always been there for me when I needed it.
2006-07-04 15:20:12 · answer #1 · answered by nep1293 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I support laws that limit access to hardcore porn by young children while not infringing on adults' access to it. I also support laws that ban taking and distributing nude photos and/or videos of minors for sexual gratification.
Those are the only 'anti-porn' laws I support.
I don't define pornography, its impossible to find a definition that more than 10 people can agree on.
2006-07-04 23:32:50 · answer #2 · answered by Spartacus007 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Only anti-pornography laws i would support is the ones that affect children.But Looking at Adult Pornography is a freedom of choice. and i define it like adult movies or picture of one or more persons having sex
2006-07-04 22:20:32 · answer #3 · answered by pistolpete797@yahoo.com 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, and that is the issue, how do you define them!
There are anti-pornography laws, I guess you just don't like them or think they go far enough!
2006-07-04 22:45:52 · answer #4 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no and I wish some body could define pornography better than most peoples definition of "I don't like other people doing that or seeing that so I will force every body to do as i think they should" I have no definition of pornography, child abuse is a whole different issue.
2006-07-04 22:43:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would accept anti pornography laws but here is the rub. Who will decide what is pornographic. Would we ban bare bum shots of babies. What about animals who are not wearing clothing. I a nude portrait by one of the master painter pornographic.
You can only be shur that when the banning starts is will be out of control. It is always so.
2006-07-04 22:46:13 · answer #6 · answered by Kenneth H 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am against anything that depicts violence against children. Anti-pornography laws should be aimed at protecting children.
If two consenting adults want to get into porn or watch porn or do whatever as long as they don't hurt others (including animals) then go for it.
2006-07-04 22:25:12 · answer #7 · answered by worldisstillthesame 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no. get a life and let others earn a living.
2006-07-04 22:18:17 · answer #8 · answered by dude 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No...and that why I don't search yahoo.fr!
2006-07-04 22:34:24 · answer #9 · answered by PantsStatusZero 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋