Who sacrificed them? The majority who were against this?
2006-07-04 12:11:15 · 13 answers · asked by Rick 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Majority of the PEOPLE weren't for the war... just majority of elected officials. They have pretty much taken this upon themselves as big changes will prove come election time.
2006-07-04 13:19:43 · update #1
Hey RocknRoll...Been there done that.
2006-07-04 13:48:40 · update #2
Please do not start me on Bush...I voted against him...I dislike him with all my heart for the way he has messed up this country...Caring just for the rich, and the corporations and saying fu*k everyone else..Now I will tell you who sacrificed them....HE DID when we went to war.....
2006-07-04 12:17:43 · answer #1 · answered by newyorkcitypimp1 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
extremely there are in basic terms some issues alongside with your question. a million. you're assuming that God did no longer create Lucifer / devil / Iblis with the explicit rationalization for figuring out to purchase him rebellion. 2. The bible mentions in basic terms some angels so a million/3 ought to have been like 5 3. The bible by no ability says you circulate to heaven the real be conscious this is used in the traditional text fabric replaced into as quickly as the two Sheol or Gianna, which mean the grave or the (actually) burning trash heap . See the Jews on the time believed that each and each men and ladies went to the comparable area whilst they died ... Sheol that's a depressing project the placement anybody went.till that they have been undeserving for the eventual resurrection then they went to Gianna and their souls have been destroyed all together yet to respond your question: do we now have unfastened will interior the terrific existence as defined interior the bible... No see Adam and eve could have maximum in all threat lived for ever in the outdoor of Eden in the event that they hadn't encountered evil. So once you define unfastened will via fact the potential to choose for between reliable and evil... And in heaven or the hot earth or something evil now no longer exists that's annoying to look how we ought to have this element called unfastened will.
2016-11-01 05:13:11 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What does that mean? It means nothing! Ironic that Bush has cut the budget of Veteran Affairs and they have been flat budgeted for his entire term though we have had people getting killed and wounded for 1/2 of his presidency!
He is like all the others. His words ring hollow and are not backed up by deeds! The reality is the military has always been treated poorly by the US people and their government.!
WE are still fighting to get the defoliant agent blue recognized as a carcinogen. Military, who were in the rice paddies of Vietnam, are dying of bladder cancer at a much higher rate than civilians.
A Purple Heart and $2.00 will get you a cup of coffee!!
2006-07-04 12:44:50 · answer #3 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you go war on the bogus premise that your enemy has weapons of mass destruction and it turns out they don't, then aren't all the deaths in vain? Bush's only solution to honor the dead is too make sure there is going to be more of them. Either send the twins over there Smirky or get the hell out before you waste any more lives.
2006-07-04 12:19:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Majority was for the war, voted by Dem and Rep in Senate and House
2006-07-04 12:24:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The idiots who are against the president and the war on terror should be rounded up and put into the Armed Forces of the USA
2006-07-04 13:12:24 · answer #6 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First, the majority of Americans supported and still support our efforts in Iraq. Secondly, he was aiming his comments at those liberal nuts who say we should withdraw and let Iraq go it alone. If that happened, then those who died to free Iraq from the butcher Saddam Hussein would have died in vain.
Chow.
2006-07-04 12:28:01 · answer #7 · answered by No one 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WHOA! Bush must be blind! Can't he see? It's ALREADY in vain... Each day more soldiers die, and FOR WHAT? As a country, the US of A stepped WAY outta her boundaries to overtake a country that didn't even ask us to interfere... The original reasons for this war DON'T EVEN EXIST ANYMORE and have been DISPROVEN... Why are they still there? I dunno... I don't mean to offend anyone by my answer, but I just thought I should speak my mind...
2006-07-04 12:21:41 · answer #8 · answered by Katie 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the man in white house will sacrifice our men in uniform, to save our $ and the economy
2006-07-04 12:38:37 · answer #9 · answered by lepactodeloupes 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did he mention anything about the --Civil War--?
2006-07-04 12:15:17 · answer #10 · answered by Commensalism 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋