Education is definitely a better investment but the elimination of welfare would only increase crime and make us look like a third world country with all the homeless. education would definitely would reduce that but it will not make it disappeared. Our duty as citizens is to pay taxes and to provide opportunities to all the citizens. My taxes provide opportunities to you and somebody else is paying taxes to create opportunities to me and so on. The bad thing is that corporations and rich people use our taxes to provide opportunities to them and they have all the benefits of tax exemptions. They make the law and create all the loop hole to favor them.
2006-07-04 12:25:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jose R 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Welfare has been eliminated in many states. How long do you think it will be before public education is eliminated as well? The welfare crisis of the 1970s and 1980s was a direct result of the incompetence of the public schools to teach anything about life skills. I guess the far-right conservatives believe that if you teach young people skills and values relevant to a productive career, then they will just have sex. Perhaps if we teach young people to have sex, they will all go into business for themselves and become like Bill Gates and Warren Buffett.
2006-07-04 12:18:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by correrafan 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
the money most states have barely has anything left for "welfare"
they are all work programs. if for some reason in most states you need help. lets say for an emergency they don't have it. they might if your lucky, qualify and can jump through all of there hoops get a current electric bill paid. maybe get food stamps. they 1970-1980's version of welfare is mostly dead and gone. those people have had to find new ways to cheat the system.
and it's hard to improve the school systems when they pay a crappy wage (I'm not including there benefits on this argument) to k-12 educators. buildings are in disrepair. I think we spend more money on prisons then schools technically.
education money isn't just on a federal level. it's state and local too. so schools are just a small fish in a big pond of bureaucracy and junk....
mom of a 2nd grader and 8th grader.... I spend a lot of money on not only school supplies but book fee's and all sorts of little stuff along the way.. parents are asked to buy supplies all the way down to i have seen them ask for the students to supply chalk, 35mm film.... and the all beloved stock up of Kleenex!
2006-07-04 12:09:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by r_me_wyf 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that that would be a better solution because too many people take advantage of welfare even with all the new rules and stuff you need to do it is still easy. I knew two people who have taken advantage of welfare even after 1997 when they started the 60 months time limit. One of them was my mom. I wasnt even living with her and she was collecting welfare for me she got welfare from 1982-2004. she got it for me and my two brother and then just the one towards the end when her lazy butt decided to finally get up and get a job. The other was the lady i was living with when my mom was getting welfare for me. She was working 2 jobs and was on welfare and 2 of her 6 kids were on social security for ADHD plus i was babysitting her kids and she was getting payments from the welfare to pay me which was like 900 a month and she only payed me 30 dollars twice then a lil later after i left she married a Native American and he was getting per capita payments and working a job plus all the other payments she was getting. So you can play the system it is still easy. WELFARE SUCKS SCHOOLING IS MORE IMPORTANT
2006-07-04 12:25:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by NessaR 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Or take the food away from all the hungry american children and use it to drop bombs on other poor people around the world.
WHY doesnt anyone protest that!!!!!
Education and welfare helps our people, they dont need to be reduced any more than they have been cut already. Refund it, feed the people, teach the people, medically insure the people, they are suffering trying to survive on minimum slave wage. Stop inflation or better, lets stop funding the war and start re-funding the american people!!!!!
Be a people for the people!
2006-07-11 11:46:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by PeaceTree 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
via fact the militia is probably going one among the few issues government must be offering. There are 40 six,000,000 human beings amassing foodstuff stamps. That has have been given to alter. you think of those photos of bread strains interior the large melancholy are all long gone? rarely. We basically use EBT playing cards now. yet issues have become worse than ever. In a rustic as rich and expansive via fact united statesa., with the financial and organic materials we've at our fingertips, there should not be 40 six,000,000 human beings on foodstamps.
2016-11-01 05:12:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because a system where welfare exists is more profitable for the rich.
It is the rich control all of the money in the world. If they weren't profiting off of welfare, it would have already been abolished.
2006-07-04 12:05:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Joe K 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
that my dear friend is another fault in our politics and government officials. the way they see it, people on welfare have to put their children into school before they use taxes for something like that. i dont think it will ever happen because, lets face it, the governement is in favor of all the wealthy people.
thnx 4 letting me rant!
2006-07-04 12:12:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by amigothicnow? 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
... well some people do need a hand now and then... and you're naive if you think the churches and private companies can handle the load... they are busy at work now, with welfare...
you know... the vast majority don't make it a lifestyle... that's the minority...
2006-07-04 12:04:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well you guys have only yourselves to blame for voting in a stupid Republican (who only cares about oil and money) as President.
2006-07-04 12:10:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Aussie Chick 5
·
0⤊
0⤋