The section about George Washington's religious beliefs is riddled with liberal and atheist propaganda saying that he was a Deist and did not partake in church activities. I tried editing the section and added many points supporting the fact that he was a Christian Episcopalian with a strong belief in Christ, providing all the necessary references and sources. Within just several hours all of my stuff was deleted and was given negative feedback by their administrators. Has anyone else encountered this liberal/atheist junk?
2006-07-04 11:19:44 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Computers & Internet ➔ Internet
Wikipedia is not a credible site anymore, people can add to the descriptions, biographies, etc. Basically they can put in their opinions if they want... Dont use the site
2006-07-04 11:24:57 · answer #1 · answered by Miss Taryn 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
i individually haven't any difficulty with Wikipedia different than that folk think of that's extreme and authentic examine gadget. Answerer above referred to it became between the wonderful obtainable because of the fact it became peer reviewed; info are actually not precise because of the fact they are peer reviewed. I even have seen many info in Wikipedia that are greater perception based or because of the fact some one thinks so as a replace of merely pointing out info. The accusation of liberal bias may be because of the fact many of the "friends" reviewing it are liberal of their ideals so any assertion backing what they have confidence will become a fact. i take advantage of wikipedia for slightly diagnosis yet use historic and different components, the info and figures given are regularly precise however the reason being usually times skewed by ability of the political leanings or the reviewer. I even have seen post right here that coach their questioning is actual because of the fact Wikipedia has an identical opinion with what they say-I even have generally seen the source being suggested as referred to yet for the reason that's written in Wikipedia that's a fact, difficulty isn't Wiki itself yet human beings utilising it to describe motives in the back of some thing or utilising the parts suggested as being opinion or non-referred to as info for the reason that's in writing.
2016-12-08 15:41:59 · answer #2 · answered by riveria 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Perhaps a conservative will view Wikipedia as having "liberal bias" while a liberal may think the opposite and perceive "conservative/right wing" bias.
My thinking is that we need to stop separating our great country into liberal v. conservative and join forces in preserving the liberties and freedoms the founding fathers intended.
"We hold this truth to be self evident, that all men are created equal". ~ Thomas Jefferson
In today's mostly conservative society, liberals are as villified by conservatives just as the nazis villified the Jews. This is a serious allegation and in my opinion we need to re-examine our animus against our fellow man. That goes for BOTH sides of the proverbial political aisle.
2006-07-04 11:33:03 · answer #3 · answered by Geminess 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes---which is why I dont there anymore.
F**king liberals are ruining our lives.
2006-07-04 11:43:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋