English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is it because women seem less threatening to other countries? Because they wouldn't be taken seriously? Or, is it something else?

2006-07-04 10:43:35 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

8 answers

women tend to be too emotional and male in other countries dont have as much respect for women as most American men

2006-07-04 10:49:37 · answer #1 · answered by huddie l 2 · 0 0

From conversations I"ve had, the world isn't ready for a u.s. president of the female gender. IMHO, men is what is holding a woman from being president back. M. Thatcher had respect when she was the leader of her country; have no idea what the issue is should a woman in the U.S run. I so hope Hilary runs!!

2006-07-04 10:48:42 · answer #2 · answered by wondering in michigan 4 · 0 0

What I think is that men throughout this world not only in the USA don't respect women enough. That and they can't get it through their minds that woman will be in charge telling men what to do, I think it should happen and I think it would be a great thing. Women think rationally and don't want to just go to war.

2006-07-04 10:54:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It has no longer something to do with totally the ladies in those countries and it has no longer something to do with being unfastened and self sufficient. this is the balloting public and their ingrained selection for a reliable chief. Stereotypically, potential is a male trait and subconsciously, human beings tend to choose for the male. remember, up till the final election it replaced right into a decision for WHITE men so we are in a place to in basic terms destroy one glass ceiling at a time. Hilary got here very, very close. basically wait 4 years. Palin for president?

2016-11-01 05:07:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There haven't been any good candidates making a serious bid for the office.

Would you have voted for Geraldine Ferraro?

Now we have the possibility of a great choice, Condaleeza Rice, although it appears that she will not actively seek the Presidency.

2006-07-04 10:48:04 · answer #5 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 0 0

so far, a woman hasn't been a candidate for president in the US, women will soon rule the world, men are becoming frozen sperm banks,, who needs them,,, they refuse to take responsibility for their unwanted embryos,,, well maybe one or two in history,, why do men want to make laws they, themselves would not ....obey......
the godless harpy of conservatism wants the 19th amendment repealed.

2006-07-04 10:53:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

not sure. a woman cant screw it up any more than the men have but Hillary is a good possible person who could do a worst job than all the other fools

2006-07-04 10:47:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Um....someone has to run before they can win.

2006-07-04 10:47:08 · answer #8 · answered by wildraft1 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers