What does everyone think will happen next now that N. Korea fired 3 missiles-one being long range?

Question

The long range missile failed, but then 2 short/medium fired. This was today, July 4, and almost immediately after the shuttle took off.

Answer 1

Korea is doomed...It is like a little tiny dog that doesn't know it is so little and thinks it can take on the big dogs. Korea is going to be anucleated. Bye North Korea...we won't miss you.

Answer 2

According to International News their were only 2 medium range missiles fired over Japan & within 300 miles of Japanese Island.
I think it is a challenge to have fire it at one country that warned them & in unision with The Challenger's lift off - the only other country to warn them.

The leader of North Korea has proved he is as insane as I have said for a month now. They are not strong enough to withstand nuclear attacks from Japan & the USA. We have the ability to shoot down any missiles but the rest of the world can not. If they bomb Canada, Mexico France, or the UK , should we consider it not our business like the Libs want us to do in Iraq.

Answer 3

News reports have said that the missiles launched were all short range. The Intercontinental missiles have not been launched as of yet.

I think we will be going to North Korea next after we finish up with Iraq.

We can't just blow them up as in the world their are certain alliances. It's like gang wars. If we attack them, then some other country will help them attack us and WWIII will start.

What does WWIII mean, well we won't be around to tell our grandkids. The whole planet's civilization will be destroyed.

Answer 4

Am I the in person-friendly words man or woman who's going to communicate about that Bubbly's interior the incorrect verbal change? Japan? WTF, mate? i visit't take the N. Korean dude heavily once you concentration on that observing team u . s . a . of us of a. i be attentive to this can nicely be an particularly stupid component to declare, yet i visit no longer help it! per danger Bush talked about the action picture too. the full component with Iraq is sticky. that's large that Saddam is out. he's an evil guy who killed innocuous human beings. that does no longer advise the ends justify the flexibility, yet lower back, he's out. Now that we've made a royal mess of the area, we received't merely flow away the Iraqi human beings extreme and dry. WE presented democracy over there, so we would want to consistently help look after it. that's though an risky u . s ., and that is our fault. We did the similar component in Japan after WW2, perfect? What purpose would N. Korea have in the adventure that they DID provide nukes our way? the distinct dominant international places of the international received't take NK's section. NK would nicely be mass chaos if it were to do something like that. In that understand, which could no longer a danger (do not get me incorrect, it really is). In Iraq stress needed for use because of the very reality reasoning merely wasn't reducing it. NK should be a powerforce interior the international, so NK has to act like one and negotiate if it needs to sit down on the lunch table with something of the cool international places. they are diverse international places with diverse circumstances, and for this reason they'd want to be dealt with in a particular way. in case you actually imagine of Bush's administration isn't completely attentive to the area in NK (you're, so for sure they are going to be a minimum of a step previous to you, whoever you're), you're merely elementary ig'nant.

Answer 5

nothing!

when almost every nation has a nuclear bomb at their arsenal it sort of makes threats from other nations look stupid especially when they are just as afraid as everyone else. honestly, if afghanistan and iraq had nukes, the US wouldn't even be in the middle east just like they aren't in Iran or North Korea and have made bosom buddies with Pakistan and China.

that's how you know a bully - they talk big when you don't have much but the minute you're capable of standing up for yourself they back down.

Answer 6

I dont know, but iam sure it wont end well, on any level.

They have succeeded in pissing off any allies they had, and thats not a place to be for a country with no economy.

When china finally pulls away from them, we might end up with some fireworks.

Either way, thats a problem that will have to be dealt with. Although iam sure there are ample people and countries sitting about ready to blame it all on the US, and millions of Americans ready to stick their thumbs up their butts and wait for them to nuke us before they complain that its bush's fault.

Whatever happens we can not have a ground assult war on their soil, they simply out number most armies out there. But they have no way of transporting them, their navy sucks and their air force is non existant. It will probably be a long distance scuffle.

Answer 7

George Bush

Answer 8

I feel sorry for South Korea and Japan. You'll never convince me that China and Russia aren't secretly giggling and supporting North Korea, just like they are Iran.

Answer 9

I think its a very scary feeling. My Great Aunt called me and told me to say a prayer, because we may just need it. Some say the US will not do anything some say they will...I dont know what will happen but I worry anyway...North Korea may not be the one to mess with

Answer 10

We should nuke all those nasty people. Get rid of them all. Except drop it right in the middle of the city wear Kim Jong Il and all his million man army live.
I dont' think the poster above me realizes how dangerous the country of NKorea really is. YOu should investigate what they do over there , it's horrific.