It seems to me that if we put another 100,000 troops into Iraq and went city to city cleaning out the weapons and insurgents, this war would be over pretty quickly.
2006-07-04 10:14:44 · 11 answers · asked by castle 2 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
The U.S. needs those troops to stop the dangerous Mexicans who are sneaking across the border.
2006-07-04 10:17:25 · answer #1 · answered by bumpocooper 5 · 2⤊ 5⤋
We don't HAVE 100,000 troops. We have ONE stinking combat division left in reserve to guard the entire continental USA, everyone else has been activated, is deployed, or is taken a much needed rest.
Why don't you sign up 100,000 of your friends and go take a turn on the fence like some of us already have?
2006-07-04 10:18:38 · answer #2 · answered by lostinromania 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think our troop strength is just fine. The trained troop strength of the Iraqi's is what needs to increase. This way we can bring our troops home. People crack me up. If you believe that America is unprotected you are smoking something. Yes, Clinton raped our military pretty good and reduced it to what many military leaders believe are dangerous levels. (which ain't nothing compared to what ole hillary would do). But rest assure, we are fine.
2006-07-04 10:35:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What makes something referred to as something. somebody got here up with a popularity for human beings and now we together call ourselves human beings (so some distance as English is in contact). How are we different from different issues? we glance different, we've different genes, we've different features, and a few could say we gained the breath of existence from God. What makes us human interior the eastern way of thinking? A human that conforms to the societal norms. Even the bible says you're a beast in case you provide your self as much as sin.
2016-11-01 05:05:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
because putting another 100000 troops in iraq wouldnt stop the insurrection, it would just inflame the already quagmire-esque landscape of iraq right now. besides, it would be horrible pr for the bush administration.
2006-07-04 10:20:19 · answer #5 · answered by The Frontrunner 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That would make it worse than it already is, the US should pull out this afternoon and let Iraq deal with their own mess.
2006-07-04 10:19:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
what about putting those troops on bin Laden's trail... you would find him pretty quick with that many and that's about 50 percent of the "war on terror"
2006-07-04 12:01:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do we have 100,000 more troops? @_@ Last I heard, we have a shortage of troops.
2006-07-04 10:18:38 · answer #8 · answered by melissa 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you really support a draft? Just more targets to prosecute and jam our courts more.
2006-07-04 10:19:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We are getting tired of listening to all you liberals whining.
2006-07-04 10:25:15 · answer #10 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋