English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

27 answers

Bush, is an imperialist, and all for the rich and take away from the poor. Without Bush's war and debt without a doubt every social program could be fully funded and still have enough to give every one a tax cut. The interest on this debt alone would fund socialized medicine. An idea whose time has come.

2006-07-04 09:48:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Carter was the worst President ever, he ushered in the first Islamic government, he did not help the Shaw of Iran, to stop the over throw of the Iranian government, by the Ayatollah Khomeini, and because of Carter Islamic terrorists have been spreading ever since. He was weak willed and had no backbone.


P.S. DJ and the Rebel........ The Confederates started the war not Lincoln, the South wanted to seceded from the Union to continue Slavery, and Lincoln thought secession illegal and was willing to use force to defend the Federal law and the Union, when the confederate batteries fired on Fort Sumter and forced it's surrender, Lincoln called on the states for 75,000 volunteers, four more slave states joined the confederacy, but four remained within the Union. the war had begun. He was one for our best Presidents, You just want to destroy everything that Americans hold dear. You must be Liberals. I guess if you had your way, you would have slaves.

2006-07-04 17:09:47 · answer #2 · answered by hexa 6 · 0 0

Herbert Hoover. After World War 1 he helped set up relief for people in Europe.

But when it came time for help at home, he basically ignored his fellow Americans

And gave orders to remove the Bonus camps from DC This was a group of World War 1 veterans who wanted their war bonus early.

Many were killed, including a solider who saved General Pattons life .

Course if you go back there are many presidents who disappointed.

Rutherford Hayes, Benjamin Harrison, Richard Nixon, Jimmy Carter, George W Bush etc

2006-07-04 16:47:45 · answer #3 · answered by mick987g 5 · 0 0

GW Bush... he has ruined the country in a mere 6 years in office. It's not that I think he is single handedly ruined everything, I actually think he is a puppet for the big guns who want to take over the world. If America is not completely detroyed in the next 2 years, I look forward to the '08 elections. I may vote Republican, but if the Dems have someone even halfway competant I will probably vote Dem simply as a protest to how f---ed up GW has gotten everything...

2006-07-04 17:50:04 · answer #4 · answered by teacher1628 2 · 0 0

DJ ...I'm with you..

Few people know about "Honest Abe". He was a tyrant and killed more American civilians than any other world leader. He was a dictator and started all this crap about going to war without the consent of Congress. The President is not our representaive. Congress represents us. We hire them to do that. The president is commander in chief but should not kill our military without the congress allowing it. Lincoln acted as if he were King of America andall after him do the same. Lincoln was the worst disappointment.

2006-07-04 16:51:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Easy, I was dissapointed by Clinton because he has the intelligence, charisma and ability to have done great things. He didn't accomplish this because of his ego.
I'm completely disgusted with Bush the second and with Nixon, but I'm not dissapointed as I never expected anything better from them. They both have a complete lack of respect for the constitution and the american people. And Bush the second is fullfilling all my expectations...sadly.

2006-07-04 16:44:48 · answer #6 · answered by pigletann 2 · 0 0

Actually it was the incompetency of President Carter that made me focus more on our elected officials. So I guess that is one thing you can say he did. I would have to say Clinton. He had the brains and the charisma to do many good things and he took the cowards weak way out on every issue. He didn't improve our economy (in fact economist are saying that is the only good thing he did, was to not touch it) My only satisfaction is knowing that he is intelligent enough to realize what a dismal failure he is not only to himself but to his nation.

2006-07-04 17:10:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

John Quincy Adams

He was a great secretary of state but as president he was horrible. He did not like it when people said things about and he was too much like his father. Not to mention he became president because of a corrupt bargain.

2006-07-04 17:21:08 · answer #8 · answered by bumpocooper 5 · 0 0

Georgia Bush. Terrorists didnt attack under Clinton and gas was a lot cheaper under CLinton. Cons hate CLinton cause he got some head from an intern and cons only get head from their cousins.

2006-07-04 16:44:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

well im only 30, so i have to say Bush Jr, look at all the problems this country is facing with him in office, Clinton had some problems but nothing like what George W is causing us

2006-07-04 16:43:48 · answer #10 · answered by beerz24_7 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers