http://www.muppetcentral.com/news/2006/020106.shtml
2006-07-04 08:28:13 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Awful. Why do we need a sequel anyway?
2006-07-04 08:31:18 · answer #1 · answered by night_trekker 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i might ought to consider each answer so far. Caddyshack became probable the wonderful golfing action picture ever, yet Caddyshack 2 became probable the worst golfing action picture ever. The Hills have eyes became fantastic and the sequel ought to have been better even nonetheless it rather chewed. i'm gonna upload city Slickers 2 to the record. the 1st one became heavily hilarious. and the 2d became merely undeniable stupid. There are not many sequels that have been better than the unique or whilst good. (godfather 2 and terminator 2 for my section are exceptions)
2016-12-08 15:40:28 · answer #2 · answered by riveria 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bad idea for three simple words: No Jim Henson.
Come on now, I am a HUGE muppet fan and nothing is as good unless the true person behind it is writing it and directing it.
2006-07-04 08:53:49 · answer #3 · answered by Danielle M 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ooh, tricky one sweetie! Part of the charm of the Dark Crystal was the whole Jim Henderson thing. I'd probably go and see it, just out of curiosity, but I love the original so much I doubt CGI would top it.
2006-07-04 08:32:40 · answer #4 · answered by butterfly_grrl 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have a LOT of faith in Genndy Tartakovsky. His work is fun, creative and very strong.
It's the storyline I worry about.
2006-07-04 08:40:34 · answer #5 · answered by mikah_smiles 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
good idea, but muppets are better, a little creepier.
2006-07-04 08:36:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
hopefully a good thing... but who knows..
2006-07-04 08:31:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋