2006-07-04 07:16:32 · 15 answers · asked by Goose 1 in Sports ➔ Basketball
They should make the trade if they feel that it is going to get them a Championship in the next two years. That is the extent of the window of possibility that Kg and Ben could lead the Bulls to the Championship.
After that MONEY is going to be a huge issue because the Bulls young players are going to need new contracts and KG will be in the twilight of his career ready for a new contract as well.
The question is which is more important getting ONE championship NOW or having the POTENTIAL to be in the hunt for Championships for the next DECADE.
2006-07-04 08:26:20 · answer #1 · answered by dscot399 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
nope- their better off keeping deng and thomas and trading Chandler- They have entertained offers involving PJ Brown, Carlos Boozer, Al Harrington, Marcus Camby and Troy Murphy- The most likely one being the PJ Brown and JR Smith swap with the Hornets-
I like the idea of them getting a PJ Brown or Camby type of player to compliment Wallace...but Garnett as incredible as he is would not be the missing piece for this team and is not worth young talent like Thomas and Deng- I think the biggest move for them now is trying to move one of either Chris Duhon/Ben Gordon for a bigger stronger 2 guard, both are better sized for the point and with Hinrich onboard they don't need 3 point guards...
2006-07-04 12:48:10 · answer #2 · answered by Glacier4 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Garnett is obviously great, but Thomas and Deng have a very bright future in Chicago. They should stay put.
2006-07-04 09:04:48 · answer #3 · answered by Akeja 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't because then there is no depth on the frontline for the Bulls. Yeah they'd have KG and Big Ben, but who'll back them up? Plus Deng is a good defender. You don't want to let that go if you don't have to.
2006-07-04 07:20:53 · answer #4 · answered by be_ez_2004 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no way in hell, Deng is a great up and comin player, and thomas could b the next amare stoudemire. i would trade chandler tho. and plus KG is past his prime while Deng still is enterin his.
2006-07-04 07:23:49 · answer #5 · answered by Matt P 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
after forking over 15 mill on ben they wont be able to afford garnett another max contract but for a superstar i would trade two role players and a rookie
2006-07-04 07:20:44 · answer #6 · answered by Detroit fan stuck in California 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I study this two times. the way you layer longer tale-suitable prose is admirable, and something I actually have a lot difficulty with. you're making it look uncomplicated, organic, yet all those who write comprehend the different is real. I usually degree the effectiveness of slightly by the variety of TD's........Jealousy rears this is eco-friendly head. Kudos to you, Mr Carney.
2016-11-30 06:56:02 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Garnett is nearing the twilight of his career. Why give up three talented young players for him?
2006-07-04 07:32:27 · answer #8 · answered by oluciano1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Won't happen now. Now the Bulls are getting Ben Wallace.
2006-07-04 07:25:42 · answer #9 · answered by lhm1968 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, 'cause now that they've bagged Ben Wallace, they shouldn't mess with the rest of the chemistry.
2006-07-04 08:34:57 · answer #10 · answered by disgruntled600 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋