when jesus freaks and nascar fans become the minorities in this country.
2006-07-04 07:19:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
i'm a bisexual atheist and that i do not help gay marriage. ask your self why? this is because no remember how stupid, fascist, ignorant, hippocritical, or purely straight forward incorrect Christianity is often, each individual has a suitable to their opinion. even as maximum Christians would truly get their opinion from a fairytale, I even haven't any problem with that- once you're too stupid to imagine for your self then per chance this is extra efficient to be non secular. If gay marriage were legalized then churches would ought to settle for homosexuals, something that if Christians have a topic with will be breach of non secular freedom. i imagine that Atheists might want to get civil partnerships/unions as a replace- that way Christians can keep their homophobic theory of marriage, and everyone can get truly a similar aspect besides, this is purely calling it something else in order to no longer offend those who've a homophobic imaginary chum.
2016-11-30 06:55:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The way I see it the gov't would have to allow murder, child porn, rape, driving while drunk, robbery, stabbings, lying, stealing and every other thing that is against the rights we were given when America became America! We established this country with God's blessings and we have much more freedom than any one else. Someone asked today if America will fall as other empires have fallen. Yes, if we keep allowing things against what our fore fathers and God established. Read the story of Sodom and Gomorrah in Genisis, chapter 18 through chapter19, verse 30. Notice all of the warnings and all of the consquences of the cities and also to Lots wife when she was told to not look back!
2006-07-04 07:41:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think some states in the US allows gay/lesbian marriages. Most cities in Europe have no problem against it either. And no, the conservative government will not allow it. The soonest u should be looking at for acceptance is if you guy in America ever elect a democratic government
2006-07-04 07:09:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think as long as religion gets mixed into the definition of marriage. And as long as the people vote for leaders who support leaders whom can't seperate religion from governing. I think it will always be a battle in society. Unless, some real strong proof of biological genes were found. That may result in change.
2006-07-04 07:09:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mae V 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
When the American people elect an administration that accepts change as a necessary in life. Has anybody seen those IBM (I think it's IBM) commercials about how some businesses will be "extinct" because they haven't caught up with the times? Enough said.
2006-07-04 07:09:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you allow that then you must allow marriages including adults and children, people and their animals, and people and objects. All of which have no business happening. Marriage has historically been husband and wife. Once you open the door to any other combination then it is that much easier to get it opened to all these other combinations. (Slippery slope).
2006-07-04 07:20:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by billybetters2 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
When Ted Kennedy becomes President.
2006-07-04 07:12:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by composertype 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who knows? It's pretty sad that a word such as marriage is more protected than two human beings are in love.
2006-07-09 17:35:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by mama 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
it's just matter of time as it is happening all over the world even in canada and spain. the usa will get with the program in time once all the bigots are shown for their true colors.
2006-07-09 15:44:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Money Maven 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Once we get the Neo-Con as*sholes out of the government.
And all the religious wackos with them.
2006-07-04 07:08:20
·
answer #11
·
answered by parshooter 5
·
0⤊
0⤋