English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

So the question I ask is.........She stayed with her hubby because shes realy is power hungry

2006-07-04 05:49:04 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

Ridiculous on both points. Obviously you have never researched any actual facts about Hillary's life.

2006-07-04 05:55:17 · answer #1 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0 1

Actually, you have not asked a queston, you have made a statement. A Question would be structured as such: "Is she power hungry?"

Perhaps before you JUDGE her, you could read her book, "It Takes a Village." My understanding of Ms. Clinton, is that she completely believes that she has something of value to offer. I would have to agree.

You, as a woman, and using the word Feminism, one would hope that you might actaully SUPPORT a woman in politics, especailly at the level she has attained, instead of suggesting that she is a greedy user who stuck with her Husband for political gain.

At the VERY LEAST, she is out there, living her life, to help build a better world. I think that deserves some credit. In all honesty, don't you? (That, is a question. Don't answer it, just really think about it for a minute.)

FYI, the whole bases of Feminist Theory (which by the way, is a political system) is that ALL women have the RIGHT, to CHOOSE for themselves any matter that effects their personal life without critisim. These rights include such things, as weather or not to work, weather or not to have children and weather or not to stay with a husband that cheats.

This is her business. You getting into it and showing your lack of understanding about the core values of Feminism is what I would be questioning if I were you. If you are 15 or younger, than you will one day understand this. Just consider this a little friendly insight from an older, wiser woman, who has studied a few things.

Holding to the Feminist Principle, you are entitled to your opinion, your ignorance and to say anything you wish. However, it would be in your best interest to know what you are talking about before you put finger to keyboard. Ya?

Wishing you Wisdom.
Judi

2006-07-04 14:24:10 · answer #2 · answered by Judi 1 · 0 0

Well lets see Mamie Eisenhower didn't, Nancy Regan didn't oh sorry Ron didn't cheat on her he cheated with her. And on and on. Clinton was not the first, I think the first was back in the early 1800's. It's a funny thing. I would assume that you have never been involved in politics. I was a Republican committee person on Long Island for awhile. Let me tell you something that most people don't know. Every politician from the ground up has his political groupies, and they are persistent. They fawn and flatter until they get close to power. It is a turn on for some women and believe me they won't quit. Doesn't matter much what the man looks like old, overweight, they just don't care! All the see is the power. Political wives know this all too well. I would bet that if you did a poll of congress,and guaranteed anonymity 3/4 of BOTH parties are involved or have been involved with these women. And the rest are women. Although I am sure they have power groupies too, it's not the same thing. But political wives all forgive and forget, or maybe just forgive. We do not know what happens once people are alone only what we see in public.So don't judge because who knows what she said to him when they were alone.

2006-07-04 13:09:14 · answer #3 · answered by olderandwiser 4 · 0 0

I don't perceive Mrs. Clinton as a feminist. She was a smart girl who bet on the winning horse. She must have stronger reasons than just soothing her wounded pride in a scandalous manner. Mrs. Clinton will always be the offended wife, and Ms. Lewinsky as the girl who saw an opportunity and took it, along with her 15 minutes of fame. People remember that, and if Mrs. Clinton ever runs for President, they'll remember that. And that she she pardoned him, which does not mean to forget and keep on doing it anyway. I'm sure that being a lawyer she must express herself pretty clearly.

Besides, none of us know what she really must've told him in the privacy of their home. They both have too much to lose, so being politicians they had to find a middle ground somehow.

Once bitten, twice shy.

2006-07-04 13:02:19 · answer #4 · answered by Karan 6 · 0 0

Mrs. Clinton seems unstable on many topics. Staying with an unfaithful husband is definitely against modern feminism. However, so are her views of the war. She has constantly defended the war. Feminism, supposedly, preaches peace. Wheas, Hilary accepts war as a rational solution.

She seems to make decisions based on political reaction. She is more concerned about her career than anything. Perhaps, her whole feminist appeal was solely for votes.

2006-07-06 14:30:07 · answer #5 · answered by man_id_unknown 4 · 0 0

Power hungry you bet. Come on Condi Rice - run for president and stop her.

It is said that Bill and Nancy are still very close and some couples can be deeply in love without sex.

Perhaps we should not rush to judge.

Since you use the word feminist it indicates your question is judgemental to start with!

2006-07-04 13:03:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Don't discount the possibility that she loves him and would have found leaving to be more painful than staying. Even more so because the Clintons' political rivals would have crowed over it on national television every day for the rest of Bill's Presidency. It might be hard for one of us to imagine the depth of the humiliation of the situation, given how much media coverage was devoted to it. I think I'd even give Mrs. Clinton credit just for not cracking up entirely.

2006-07-04 12:58:06 · answer #7 · answered by devyn_d 3 · 0 0

Thats not really a question. True feminism is giving women the choice about what they want to do, instead of having them told what to do by others who think that they know better (i.e. when women should work, when they should stay home). So, really, any true feminist would have made her own decision, rather than what society told her to do.

2006-07-04 12:53:01 · answer #8 · answered by Squashie16 3 · 0 0

She's a corrupt modern feminist who believes that anything that advances any woman is feminism. Being unwilling to swallow herself, yet then having to swallow the existence of Lewinsky, was doctrinal obedience to feminism because it allowed her to be rewarded with a seat in the U.S. Senate for her role as the victim. If playing the victim gets you ahead, that's feminism. Its all about the power - not about the method.

2006-07-04 12:52:31 · answer #9 · answered by robabard 5 · 0 0

Divorcing Bill while he was still in office would have been a hugely bad move for her, on a professional level. And who is to say-as much as I despise Hitlery-that the two of them don't have great love for each other. I am not a feminazi, but it seems to me Hitlery set a good example for forgiveness.

I am sure most of her motivation for staying with his lying a$$ was her own ambition, but who is to say for sure. Maybe there really is some strange form of love between them.

2006-07-04 13:28:54 · answer #10 · answered by kelly24592 5 · 0 0

I guess she still loves him. Bush had sex with a gay male hooker and Laura stays with him.

Mesquite Gal, google the name "Jeff Gannon" and you can find out for yourself, instead of attacking the messenger. If you can come up with another explanation as to why a gay hooker visited the White House 196 times under phony press credentials including 62 times when there was no press conference and 14 times when he spent the night, you tell me. It might as well be you because I've asked the White House, Sean Hannity (3 times), Zell Miller, the RNC, and Tom Delay and none of them even bothered to respond.

2006-07-04 12:58:47 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers