Is it a viable thing, or are pageant contestants just full of it?
2006-07-04 05:09:45 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
It is possible but not until we shed the concept of statism, the earth is now suffused with groups who believe it is their right to use coercion on others to get what they want, never under this ideology will we have world peace.
2006-07-04 05:58:51 · answer #1 · answered by iconoclast_ensues 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
You want world peace?
Then start a movement to force the slimy, corrupt representatives at the UN to actually fulfill their mandate! The UN is like a big social club. They wine and dine, and have extravagant parties while people in places like the Sudan live and die in misery.
The UN was supposed to back up its resolutions with force, knowing that some nations would not accept the judgments against them. However, this has become a joke. Saddam Hussein just thumbed his nose at 17 stern UN resolutions. The president of Iran recently said that UN resolutions meant absolutely nothing to him. He just laughs at them.
The United States would not have had to pursue war with Iraq if the UN Security council had not been bought off by Saddam via the Oil For Food scandal. France, China, Russia, Germany.... they were all bought off. Saddam literally bought their "no" votes, so the U.S. was forced, once again, to be the adult while everyone else acted like irresponsible children.
If the UN is going to honor its charter and fulfill its mandate, it has to stop the corruption and start enforcing its resolutions. Iran would be a good start!
2006-07-04 05:19:44 · answer #2 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Great you should ask that. It proves that the elite that have been pulling the strings for centuries have their plan working perfectly. They had two attempts to create their "one world government", after WW1 and WW2 with the League of Nations and the United Nations. Both of those are rough failures, so we have attempt #3 in action right now.
The idea is to make the entire world so war-weary that they are begging for a world-wide police state that isn't prone to open warfare. Sounds like a good idea for some, but myself personally I would fight that system just as hard as any war.
2006-07-04 05:14:33 · answer #3 · answered by lostinromania 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
pageant contests are full of it, there will never be world peace perhaps a mutual understaing agreement but never true peace, there is no uinifying effort or force for one, there would have to be a global/worldwide effort against a common enemy(alien) to even come close. but alas that only happens in movies
2006-07-04 05:14:39 · answer #4 · answered by futurehero5200 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes but the government should be more interactive, informing, with the people so a mutual understanding can exist. I think laws will still need to be in place but now people will not like there freedoms to be taken away instead of now having 3 hots and a cot.
2006-07-04 05:16:18 · answer #5 · answered by Commensalism 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
regrettably, no. international leaders are too wrapped up of their petty and ego-pushed campaigns to be king of the hill and performance potential over others. even as they DO locate themselves in a stretch of time the position there is peace, they locate it very unusual and unchallenging, so that they pass searching for difficulty. Then there are those nimrods contained in the middle East who refuse to leave the 10th century. Astoundingly backwards. How else to describe all that combating for hundreds of years over what's basically the international's greatest sandbox? Frankly, i imagine we may purely have a chance for international peace if each of the international locations had women leaders. in view that women supply existence, they cherish it extra. men won't be able to offer existence, so the in straight forward words way they're usually as "efficient" is to grant lack of existence as a replace of existence. i'm very grateful that i'm gay -- i'd hate to be so damned pushed by testosterone.
2016-11-30 06:48:38 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not likely. It would take a tremendous amount of maturing before human can get along in this world.
2006-07-04 05:16:49 · answer #7 · answered by Gene K 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If we (peoble) still have markets and private proberties, it is imposible.. b-coz our nature as human bieing. but we can control the world peace by knolodge and fair world law and fighting racism.
2006-07-04 05:36:57 · answer #8 · answered by zaaterah 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
World peace is a nice dream, but it is only a dream.
2006-07-04 05:30:32 · answer #9 · answered by » mickdotcom « 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes when humans no longer exist
2006-07-04 05:13:28 · answer #10 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋