My moisturizer has SPF 15, as does my powder. I put them both on my face... does this mean my face is covered by SPF 30 protection?
2006-07-04 04:52:10 · 12 answers · asked by upstairs_albert 2 in Beauty & Style ➔ Makeup
i don't think so
i think it's just 15
2006-07-10 11:30:12 · answer #1 · answered by mirleta_liz 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not math. Just because you put on two 15 SPF products they do not add up to SPF 30 on the face. They have different ingredients that make them a certain strength.
2006-07-04 04:57:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nah, its not as simple as that..... if it were so, ten applications of your moisturiser would give you SPF 150! SPF, or TPI, is indicative of a formulation's efficacy at blocking solar(esp. ultraviolet) radiation from reaching your skin. Its to do with the composition, as you can see an exponential rise in price with increasing SPF!
but, i guess, you will definitely have better protection than spf 15 if you use both together...but 30 is a tough ask!
2006-07-04 05:06:04 · answer #3 · answered by Sho Biz 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO, it just means you have even more SPF 15 on your face.
2006-07-04 07:54:43 · answer #4 · answered by MEB 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, but you'll have an awesome insurence policy to protect you and assure that you have the full SPF 15
2006-07-04 05:44:55 · answer #5 · answered by answer annie 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, only SPF 15 strength.
2006-07-04 04:56:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO NOT AT ALL, THERE WAS AN ARTICLE NOT TOO LONG AGO ON THE SPF USEED IN CREAMS AND OTHER PRODUCTS AND IT SEEMS LIKE COMPANIES ARE OVER KILLING THEM, I DO NOT KNOW JUST WHAT IS BEST
2006-07-04 05:03:20 · answer #7 · answered by homebobmoney 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nah...........actuall its a chemical formulation stating spf 15,
oaky temme one thing does na and cl makes table salt......???
2006-07-04 04:56:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would say so...15+15=30 right? lol.
2006-07-04 06:14:25 · answer #9 · answered by Becca H 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nope
2006-07-04 04:59:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋