Oh I am sure they had something to do w/ it. They have fed us b/s about it for the longest. Think about the time frame - economy is in the tank, Bush itching to get into Iraq. Please this was all about oil and money. If anything they allowed Sept 11th to happen to divert attention away from the true isses which was unemployment and the economy and focus on a crisises they allowed to happen. And please don't tell me that people still believe that people on that Philadelphia flight really crashed the plane, please, it was shot down by some F16s.
2006-07-04 04:44:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by aj1908 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Answer this then...North and south tower both collapsed in and upon itself as if it had been done professionally. So lets say you believe where they say it was damaged structurally by the fire from the jet fuel. Well then I beg you--watch video of Bld 7. It come down perfectly in and upon it self too. This was never hit by a plane. How come Bush stayed in the school in Florida when this happened if it was by terrorists. Would they not whisk him away to not endanger the children there or his life? Or did he know already he was safe? Read about the Caspian sea. It is one of the last places on earth that we can get our oil that has not been used yet. We only have another few decades in the middle east before we run out. We have to eliminate certain groups over there before we can negotiate this. Read about the huge fire in PA that was a tall steel building. It burned hotter than the Twin Towers and how come it didn't collapse?
2006-07-04 11:58:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by inkspotter2000 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've heard this alot.
At this point I don't care.
My son lived a couple of blocks from the WTC and could have been killed (he wasn't thank God).
At this point I don't care who was at fault, I do know that our government dropped the ball. I am not at all impressed with our court appointed commander in chief's inability to respond.
I watched, as many of you other did, our president "seize up" for nine minutes!!! While he waited for the other planes to do their damage. Then he got up and flew to his real bosses in Louisianna (the oil companies) for directions.
It's clear this guy (Bush) isn't playing on our team.
2006-07-04 12:11:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the government could of been behind it and George Bush could of blamed terrorists for it so that it could give his country a reason to invade iraq, but we can't prove Al Quidas did or didn't do it anyway because there was no cctv footage of them on the plane doing it, so it could of been a FBI person that did it (for example), but because they show us a couple of pass ports of Pakistani's that where supposed to be on the plane (which could of been planted so easily because they are the government) they expect us to believe them. So it could of so easily been the government.
2006-07-07 18:22:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Goose_Cheese 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Our government?
Not hardly, although there are MAJOR issues that make me doubt government decisions, in no way do I believe that they would do something like that. However, I do believe that the administration spun it to make most Americans believe that Iraq was involved to justify further the war against Iraq.
2006-07-04 11:50:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by DeltaQueen 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gov was all behind it
these poor guys never went to aero school and there never have been an Arabic flying manual. coz all planes are made in the west and all aerodynamic manuals are in eng, ger, or french
2006-07-04 11:44:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Nader 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
it depends because there was a lot of confusion but I didnt think that the government was going to destroy two of their buildings. It was the terrorists
2006-07-04 11:43:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
the government i seen a thing on it the building had explosives in it.
2006-07-04 19:36:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by lizardlover42000 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think we will ever know the truth and Im not sure I want to know.
2006-07-04 11:46:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by eg_ansel 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
haha, nice theory. given bush's crazed oil desire, that's something plausible.
2006-07-04 11:43:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by riafanel 3
·
0⤊
0⤋