I saw it last night and I think I would have been better off watching a porn... that is what WWE has turned into... What happened to WRESTLING?
TNA is much better. They actually WRESTLE!
2006-07-04 03:57:10 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
I am not a pre teen or a teen. So don't be rude!
2006-07-04 11:20:12 · update #1
You people are so rude!
2006-07-04 11:24:39 · update #2
Thank you!!! I have been asking this same question for the longest time. TNA has more wrestling in a 1hr program than any of WWE's 2hr programs. Bringing back ECW, brining back DX ( at least somewhat entertaining), and it's well known that Vince only appears on TV when he's concered about his company. It all adds up to say TNA is the real deal. WWE is gotta be concerned. Maybe if Vince was a little less worried about profit and more concerned about the fans the ratings wouldn't be steadily declining. SHOUT OUT TO TNA!!!
2006-07-04 11:25:16 · answer #1 · answered by bar 4 · 1⤊ 6⤋
TNA is a low budget indy promotion with all the stars that got rejected by WWE. The X Division is the only thing worth watching. And if you don't like the product, here's a solution: don't watch it. Just change the channel or put in a tape of some classic matches.
2006-07-04 07:15:27 · answer #2 · answered by oluciano1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like both UFC and WWE. But TNA sucks! Their story lines make no damn sense. Examples: Abyss teaming with James Gang against Team 3D??!??!?!?!??!?!?! Why, there not family. LAX protesting, there not doing anything? How does this attract viewers. Mainly TNA is full with WWE rejects. Half the roster have wrestled in WWE before. Jeff Jarrett as champion?!?!?!??!?! RGHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!! At least WWE sells out arenas around the world. While TNA can barely sell out a bingo hall! TNA CAN KISS MY ***!
2006-07-04 04:47:06 · answer #3 · answered by JustinCredible 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For a more real since of wrestling HWA has a good show which can be viewed online without commericals.
Whoever came up with the format of starting a match and running off to a 7 min commerical should be fired or sent off to promote golf.
2006-07-04 07:16:52 · answer #4 · answered by dam 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jack Swagger he's been a international Champion earlier, yet to be consumer-pleasant his call reign became standard at desirable. i'd argue the in straight forward words aspect conserving Swagger back is his mic skills. He purely don't have sufficient air of secrecy on the mic to be taken heavily. Swagger is between the extra proficient men contained in the hoop, yet he won't be able to carry his personal on the mic to maintain his existence. It sucks too because i'm a Swagger fan, yet as long as he has standard mic skills, i do not see him being a significant experience participant anytime quickly. WQ: I well known the raw Chamber... besides the actual incontrovertible reality that both were pleasing. WQ2: i'm fantastic with it. I see no reason that is purely no longer a properly wrestled experience.
2016-11-30 06:44:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wrestling died when all the pre teens got into watching wrestling.
2006-07-04 04:07:51 · answer #6 · answered by Dusty 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I stopped watching WWE about 3 years ago. UFC is the best.
2006-07-04 04:00:35 · answer #7 · answered by rfl_manuk 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if the girls really wrestle, its worth watching. but mostly i hate it when it is apparent that it is all a sham and makeshift. i mean you can just orchestra the moves and know the results beforehand. why can't it be real with some guiding principles.
2006-07-04 05:29:25 · answer #8 · answered by akhneel 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOL I agree Girlfriend!! Its just like watching a Soap..You dont have to watch it for 3 years and they will still be stuck on the same story line!!
2006-07-04 04:00:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
ahh yeah i hate the WWE too it is like a soap opera unless they bringback all the old people and get rid of the old ones and combine smackdown and raw then it would be better
2006-07-05 07:36:31 · answer #10 · answered by Redsox324 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋