Ben Wallace?

Question

Do you think it was a good move to sign with the Bulls? Or a mistake?

Answer 1

I guess if it was money he was after then good for him. The Pistons won't be the same without him. Maybe if he could hit closer to 50% of his free throws and not be afraid to shoot, then he would be worth spending more money on. Goodbye Ben

Answer 2

i think it wuz a good move 4 both sides. Bulls got their big tough defender down low and Ben is on a talented up and comin team. if Ben and Flip Saunders weren't gettin along, thn if Ben would have stayed on the Pistons it would of made things worse in Detroit, now Ben has a fresh start. everyone keeps sayin tht Ben and Tyson Chandler r the exact same type of player, and yeah thy 4r, but Ben brings more intensity to the table and now bulls can trade Tyson and hopefully get more guys to help thier team.

Answer 3

Bad move. He was getting paid the most of all the Pistons players and Joe Dumars had did alot for him when no one else would. He would nto be who he is if it was not for Detroit. he just got stingy and thinks he worth more than he actually is. he can do what he want to do for all i care. i'm behind detroit one hundred percent and they will be all right without him

Answer 4

i think it was good for Chicago to sign Ben Wallace i think it will improve their team with this strong defensive guy. but it's gonna bring down the defense of the Detroit team. they gonna need strong a defense to stop any team and without it it will fall apart.

Answer 5

Good move the Bulls are back.

Answer 6

A mistake. I think he is just mad at the offer Detroit gave him. The Pistons had a good thing going and had to go and screw it up!

Answer 7

I'm from detroit and i say its okay.
Because i like the bulls. But pistons are lot better

Answer 8

bad