every reason we were given at the biginning of the war has been proven to be a lie.no wmd's no links to al-queda before the war.so sadam killed a couple hundred people,how is this any differant then what we did to the indians?we did it for land sadam did it because they tried to kill him.yes i agree he went overboard but the world doesn't have the same value system we do, does that make them wrong?atleast when he was incharge the country was a bit more stable then it is today.
2006-07-04 01:47:40 · 17 answers · asked by stanyazfan 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
I not only admit it, but I said it from the beginning, we have no business attacking a sovereign nation for the sole purpose of creating a government in our image. These country's have a right to go to hell as they please and if they want to change their government it is up to the people to rise up and do it.
2006-07-04 02:08:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It wasn’t a lie. That is just Politics by the Democrats since they have been out of power for 10 years and they desperately want the power back. So they will call inaccurate intelligence from our country, Russia, France, Spain, UK, a “lie” when they don’t have a single bit of proof anyone was lying. In fact it is a lie to say someone is lying without proof.
The day when they change the rules and start calling someone that was wrong is a liar then that is the day we need to look up and see if Kerry “ever” said he was wrong. :)
Although Saddam agreed to let us inspect his country for WMD after we won the war in Kuwait, he refused our inspectors to look for WMDs. The only way we could be sure that he didn’t have WMD was to go in and see for ourselves. By this time he was shooting at our surveillance planes and refusing to let us inspect for these WMDs.
Whether we invaded, found WMD and destroyed them, or didn’t find WMD, the most important thing that we did by invading Iraq was insure WMDs were and are not being produce that could fall into enemy hands and terrorists hands.
If we didn’t invade Iraq everyone including Kerry would be wondering if they had WMD and what weapon of mass destruction they were they going to use on us. Would it be Nuclear? Would it be biological? Would it be chemical? Or would it just be planes again.
Don’t pretend that if we didn’t go into Iraq that the Democrats would be saying Iraq didn’t have WMD. No they would be just the opposite claiming that we are at risk because Bush would not go into Iraq and destroy all the WMDs. They would point out the slew of countries that intelligence indicates Iraq has WMD, they would rehash how far back Kerry and Hillary warned of WMD and nothing was done by this White House.
We already see them claiming that we should have our troops and resources to protect us against WMD from N. Korea and Iran. Are they basing their concerns on the same intelligence that they claim was a lie in Iraq? Yes, they certainly are.
It is shameful that the Democrats will use their desperation for political gains on the back of our fighting troops. Kerry was almost bankrupt when he married his billionaire wife. Now he is richer than a dozens of Bushes and Cheneys put together. There might be a millionaire every few blocks in this country but there are less than 500 Billionaires in the Word, and Kerry is one of them… talk about winning the lottery when he married his wife! Don’t think for a minute that type of “opportunist” isn’t going to use our fighting men for his own political gains. He did it before from Vietnam (surprise) and doing it again from Iraq (surprise).
Until you guys start putting your country ahead of your Politics, you will still not have the control of the White House, The Senate, The House of Representatives or the Governorships throughout this country. Americans can see right through you and the very reason we don’t have a Dean or Kerry as Commander and Chief.
2006-07-04 02:33:22 · answer #2 · answered by Raylene G. 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your question starts with your opinon that th USA was wrong.
1-- 2 weeks ago the gov. released the info about the WMD that have been found over 500 shells with Sarin and mustard gas. It may not have been reported on MTV but the info is out there if you look.
2--Sadam killed a couple hundred?? a couple hundred per day is more like it. The mass grave our troops have uncovered have 10's of thousand of men women and CHILDREN in them.
3-- As for no ties with al-queda again they have proof that Iraq secret police did have meetings with members of al-queda and more proof that Sadam was supporting them finacialy.
4-- Wrong is wrong there is no way to spin killing , torture, rape as a different value system.
2006-07-04 02:08:01 · answer #3 · answered by danzka2001 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The country was only stable because Sadham ruled as a dictator. Dictators make it so the people fear him. The only reason there is trouble in iraq now would be because of some actions the US troops has conducted with the people.
No we will never admit that we were wrong, nor will we admit we were right.
No the world doesn't have the same value system as we do, and to be the advocates to spread democracy I think is wrong. It should not be up to us to decide whether or not a country needs democracy. It should be the country itself.
2006-07-04 01:54:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
for sure no longer. All you're able to do is look on the PNAC website and do not forget that they preserve the info of their pre-deliberate conflict in Iraq to on the instantaneous. they received't admit they were incorrect because they truly do not imagine they are. which will be the case even even as terrorism turns into area of each day existence as a suitable away results of their moves. those human beings are extra fanatical and hazardous than even their own perceptions of Muslim terrorists might want to ever be if in spite of if those perceptions were truly real.
2016-10-14 02:46:59 · answer #5 · answered by anthony 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who really cares. We're in the war already you can't turn back time and stop it. Why ***** about it when it changes nothing. All we can do is finish up over there. What our history is with the indians is different than what Saddam did with his people, he killed innocent civilians and treated them unfairly. And none of them could ever fight back. And with us and the indians they fought hard but in the end we were just better armed and far more superior.
2006-07-04 01:57:17 · answer #6 · answered by Ryan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Honestly Stanzya, when have WE ever admitted WE made a mistake? I just love how WE are held responsible for the decisions that were made by a president that the PEOPLE didn't even elect.... OH DON'T GET ME STARTED......No we never will. We will never have a real "by the people and for the people" government either.
2006-07-04 01:54:54 · answer #7 · answered by nanawnuts 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most of the world knew it was wrong from the beginning.
2006-07-04 01:52:22 · answer #8 · answered by toweroftusks 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Librals! ya think ya no evry thing. we need a man of God leading our country like bush.
2006-07-04 01:57:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yep
but i bet bush will make up some half biased lie that iraq "FORCED" america to invade it. blah
2006-07-04 01:52:25 · answer #10 · answered by x_cybernet_x 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋