2006-07-04 01:43:14 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Basketball
Most certainly. 4 years for $60 million, while the Pistons were offering 4 years at $48 million. I would say the Bulls vastly overpaid for a guy who is in his early 30s with little/no offensive game. They would have been better off pursuing Chris Wilcox and saving cash for an All-Star break move.
2006-07-04 02:29:39 · answer #1 · answered by indianalee 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Bulls needed one more piece to contend, a defensive center. they went out and got possibly the best defensive center ever. Management delivered and now they actually have a shot at the finals. 60 million is cheap considering that.
2006-07-04 10:01:43 · answer #2 · answered by whetzellus 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes but they getting what they need the most rebounding and inside toughness his rebounding will get a very quick bulls team out in transition
2006-07-04 09:10:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
im sure detroit pistons would pay big ben just the same had they have salary cap.
2006-07-04 11:13:42 · answer #4 · answered by chock d. 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that's wat i was thinking cuz ben himself isn't that much of a force on offense. Chandler is really awesome on defense as well. The bottom line is none of them can guard shaq. They did pay 2 much man. I mean we had chandler
2006-07-04 13:10:53 · answer #5 · answered by Salman Y 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so, i mean they had to out bid detroit to get his talent here in the windy city.....all in all , i think its a good move, and its about time we start building a team.
2006-07-04 08:51:56 · answer #6 · answered by chitowndub 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obviously they thought that he was worth the money, so I would say no
2006-07-04 15:26:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋