how many of you who voted for Bush not once but twice regret your mistake?

Question

for george d since when is asking a legit question make you a retard check yourself baby as you sound a little off your rocker how many of the 2500 soldiers were related to you and at the time Iraq was not our enemy afghanistan was but hey where the hell is osama bin laden oh that's right hiding out biding his time while we are busy in Iraq Bush could not catch the bastard so he went after someone he thought was an easier target

nicholas yes many soldiers do blame bush for being in Iraq while they are dying and yet he shirked his military duty years ago

Answer 1

I Didn't vote for him either time and I say it with much pride! I Would have voted for a donkey that ran against him..even a donkey would have had more sense. Thank God he will soon be out..come on 2008! with speed!

Answer 2

I voted for him twice and I don't regret it, one bit

The choices were limited to him and Kerry and I'm from Massachusetts, so I know Kerry's record pretty well

it was a no brainer

W is the best of the lot

otherwise we would be listening to Kerry explain why he decided to sit down with the "insurgents" and basically pay them off to stop the bloodshed.
That is not going to solve the current problem and that's exactly what Kerry would have done, talk and more talk
and then write them a big fat check, at the expense of the American taxpayer

and the underlying reason for the terror and the terrorism would continue to remain a threat.
Kerry would do the same thing that the Clinton Administration did and that was to treat it as a civil matter - when its not
and I'm sure he would hope after he had given them millions
they would go away.
but the reason for the terror cant be abated with money
and the democrats just dont get it.
you either blast the terrorists and help the Iraqi's formulate a new
more just government and country
or you blast the terrorists later.
I think its better to be proactive about this

Answer 3

Lady, you are a retard. You should go read Shakespeare's play, Corialanus, if you can read. Maybe you had somebody type this question in for you.

The main character in that play is of course the Roman Senator and general Corialanus. He is about to be elected tribune, but to receive this position he must gain a certain measure of support from the people, that is the general populace.

Throughout Greek and Roman history, the issue of democracy and the democratic tyrant, was an ever confounding question.

Democracy promises at one level to protect the people from tyranny by enfranchising them with political power, but at another level it dooms them to tyranny because in their weakness and laziness they are unable to use their political power for anything but the indulgence of their own passions.

People call George Bush Hitler, and tyrant, and murderer and all of this sh*t, but I haven't noticed that he is sending out death squads to kill George Clooney, or secret police to round up dissidents.

Basically, he is just engaging without apology in a method of government that people knew he stood for before he was elected.

The thing the democratic man hates more than anything, is a political figure, someone in authority who doesn't bow down to his ranting screaming petty will.

This is the fundamental issue in Corialanus. Corialanus cannot be elected tribune because he despises the people. He is the strong man and he has the learning and the discipline to make good decisions in government, so why does he need the approval of a petty mob.

Bush hasn't done anything to anybody, except offend a bunch of people who can't stand the fact that his whole purpose in government is not catering to their volatile and worthless emotions.

I didn't vote for the man, not have I ever voted for any Republican, but he certainly isn't the devil people make him out to be.

By the way, a war that lasts four years or so and costs about 2500 American lives, in the whole context of history is about as insignificant and puny a war as can possibly be imagined.

Do you not know that many Americans on the Union side during the Civil War, hated Grant and Lincoln, because they didn't believe slavery and the issue of secession were there problem. Especially considering the tens of thousands upon tens of thousands of American lives that these men were sacrificing to their cause.

Grow Up, BABY!!!!

Answer 4

OK, as for your additional comments, Clinton is the one that really failed in capturing bin Laden, not once but three times. Whether I voted for Bush or not, he is the President and there isnt anything that will change the administration until the next election, so where are you going with your question? Regrets, sure, everyone has them, but why is this important now? It isnt.

Will it make it better if people apologize to you for voting for Bush???

Answer 5

I voted for him twice as did my wife, and we are very proud we did. Why not put the election aside, accept the judgment of the majority of the American voters, and support our President in these difficult times?? 2008 is still two years from now. He is the only President we have until January 20, 2009. Hopefully at that point we will be welcoming President John McCain.

Answer 6

I wish I could vote for him a 3rd time.
George D...loved your answer but this idiot got lost on the 1st paragraph I am sure...Bush is a man not God. He makes mistakes at times and sometimes he hits a home run. The fact that the left hates him makes me think more of him. The one thing that can not be said is that he is a do nothing. (Thinks of Carter and Clinton at this time) No regrets

Answer 7

I voted for Bush twice and would vote for him again. (My first time voting Republican.) Certainly against someone like Kerry or Gore. Moreover, Bush has been a great President. The country is in great shape.

Answer 8

I am ashamed to admit that I voted for Bush the first time around, and I sincerely apologize to for that. I really don’t think Gore could have been worse.
Second time around I would have voted for just about anybody that ran against him. Sorry

Answer 9

I voted for Bush twice and do not regret it. Both times, he was better than what was offered. I am not saying that he was what I wanted but what was the best choice of the times.

Answer 10

No regrets here.

How many terrorist attacks on U.S. soil, since 9/11?

How was voting for him a mistake? Do you have any criticism's you can back up?

--------------------

Mark, I call B.S. on you. I have talked with hundreds of soldiers, and not one of them had any regrets about how our president has handled things.
--- of course, now that I think about it, maybe you are part of saddam's old party sitting out in the sun.