English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Would it be safer to eat a dead vegitarian, knowing they are less likely to be full of toxins, or to eat the fat slob who might keep you warm and full longer?

I didnt know what other catagory to include this in, so please dont mock my curiosity.

2006-07-03 08:29:29 · 4 answers · asked by jademonkey 5 in Food & Drink Other - Food & Drink

4 answers

LOL~ thats funny, great question by the way, but how would you know there a vegeitarian, any way if he/she was then I know he would have eaten me if it was the other way around, so srew the vegetarian Im going to eat her first, she shouldnt have been a hypocrite, lier, atleast I would have known the motives of the fat guy, any way I can cut the fat guy open and liv inside his belly for a while

2006-07-03 08:35:57 · answer #1 · answered by Derrick 3 · 1 0

Call for help over the radio.Don't eat a person.First, see if you can get the airline crackers off the plane and eat them. If you can't then search the glacier for newly dead animals or plants. Plants would be better. Then, only if you absolutely have to may you become a cannibal. I would eat the vegetarian but only if I absolutely had to.

2006-07-03 15:44:31 · answer #2 · answered by xox_Edward_xox 2 · 0 0

Assuming there are no dead to eat, I'd go for the fat guy...you get more food for the death and the vegetarian is going to have a hard time consuming raw flesh, so you'll get more. And if the veg. can't handle it, he'll likely die anyway so you'll get them both and last longer.

2006-07-03 17:42:51 · answer #3 · answered by Bee 1 · 0 0

HAHA VERY FUNNY
JUST CONTACT SOMEONE FOR HELP
AND ROCK PAPER SCISSORS OF ENI MINI MINI MO

2006-07-03 15:36:36 · answer #4 · answered by abadrichgirl3322 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers