both....
2006-07-03 07:42:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jack Kerouac 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
It is 100% man made. Natural climate change does not occur this fast.
An important fact. Humans have been emitting more CO2 than all natural sources combined for OVER 100 YEARS.
At our current emission rate we are putting out about 40X more CO2 than volcanoes, which are the favorite culprit according the the naysayers. Not true.
The other favorite of the naysaying crowd is solar activity, which they say is at a high point. What they don't tell you is that the solar activity cycle is just 11 years long. It is at a high point but it was at a low point in 1996 and at a high point again in 1990 and a low point again in 1986. Funny I don't remember an ice age in 1996 or in 1986.
The scientific debate about global warming is over. The consensus is that global warming is occurring and that humans are the primary cause. The naysayers claim it is still a big debate but then they also say evolution is also a big debate. Both are settled science.
2006-07-03 07:50:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Engineer 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, that certainly is a big debate! Some scientists even dispute that we are having global warming. It is probably some of both. The earth has naturally gone through warming and cooling phases. It is a good thing that we had a warming phase after the ice age! Anyway, I don't know why so many people give credence to everything that Al Gore says. After all, this is the same man that told us that he created the Internet!
2006-07-03 07:54:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by runningviolin 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Global warming is a natural occurance, but has been blown out of porportion by the Democrats and liberal Media. They want to try to distract people from the real issues of their promotion of Murder (abortion), and promotion of perversion (Special rights for The Sodomites), promotion of a their GodLess Agenda. Why worry about Global warming when these Evils will eventually destroy the US and bring God's judgement upon all people!
2006-07-03 16:20:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Kitten 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
What does it rely? Hasn't all technology now been proved a tax elevating, one international government. fraud? You do comprehend that each and every person technology is so intertwined, and interdependent, that if one component to technology is "pretend" , or a "fraud" , it may be like having an engine with wood pistons. What component to technology is being faked? Is it basically the Atmospheric Scientists? Are the Climatologists in on the international extensive US tax rip-off? how many Marine Biologists do you think of are faking archives to suck up furnish money? How long has this fraud been occurring? What did they do with the actual archives till now the rip-off replaced into began? have they have been given a secret convention consistent with annum to indoctrinate the those days graduated Scientists? have they have been given a secret handshake to discover fellow tax conspirators? Is the present money shortage being brought about via the phony Scientists hoarding all their ill gotten good points below their mattresses? With all technology being denied via fact of those stolen e-mails, will elementary experience finally be triumphant? I mean, any fool can extremely see that it is the sunlight warming us because it orbits the Earth. no one extremely desires an elitist Scientist to appreciate that the sunlight strikes around the sky, via fact the Earth stands nonetheless.
2016-11-01 03:45:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by treiber 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope not natural...man made. Scientifically proven by obeservation of patterns in temps over millions of years (studies on Ice Cores, Rocks, and Tree Rings). The pattern has been clearly effected since the beginning of the Industrial Age (about 1700 AD).
2006-07-03 07:44:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by thebigm57 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I personally think it is man made. It was not until the indudtrial revolution that the world started or saw change in the ozone. I do not think it is just a myth, I believe it is 100% man made.
2006-07-03 08:13:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by M M 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dear LaserMouse;
Before the issue of who caused G.W, there is the
question: Is it REAL or not?
"G.lobal W.arming" is an IDEA, a mental construct, a conclusion or a question, which WE humans posit (sense or assume)
In Cosmic Terms, we just don't live long enough, (only at about-most 100 revolutions of our planet around its Sun)
We alive now, will never know.
But our childrens' childrens' children, might know.
2006-07-03 07:52:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by DinDjinn 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
both because we have pollution yea but a big valcanic eruption can put 500 years of man made pullution into about 3 days of work
2006-07-03 08:27:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by ace_of_tomorow 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I personally think that it is man-made. With all that pollution in the air, and all the damage to the ozone layer, I would have to say That it is definitely our fault.
2006-07-03 07:43:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by BabyDoll 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Caused by changes in radiance of the sun, not man made
2006-07-03 07:47:22
·
answer #11
·
answered by Mad Jack 7
·
0⤊
0⤋