English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-03 05:10:27 · 10 answers · asked by digilook 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Objectivity, as with beauty, is in the eye of the beholder.

2006-07-03 05:14:26 · update #1

I gave up being all knowing 22 years ago, and yourself? And your point is?

2006-07-03 05:16:25 · update #2

10 answers

Because the circular reasoning can only end when faith enters the equation.

2006-07-03 05:12:48 · answer #1 · answered by 4999_Basque 6 · 1 0

I agree with Jim. There is an objective reality that both camps, in fact all camps are trying to explain. Science is using objective measurements to make objective conclusions. Religion is using subjective "philosophy" to make objective conclusions.

2006-07-03 05:24:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No-one can agree on this subject, not even theist can agree on who God is, and atheist cannot give us spiritual guidence so no point following them. That is why it is better to keep your beliefs personal and learn from others who do the same, otherwise you are bound to have defend them by becoming your own worse enemy. If you believe God is good, then you cannot do bad in "Gods" name. I can only take responsibilities for my own actions, i cannot say it was God who told me to do it. If God wants something done it will be done by God, not me.

2006-07-03 05:21:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's a battle of 2 (count'em TWO) religions.

One has a deity,

the other an orthodoxy of "science" as the god...

both must chase their tails to avoid any possibility of the other's exixtence.

2006-07-03 05:17:46 · answer #4 · answered by R J 7 · 0 0

i like your snake/rope analogy - it demonstrates your argument nicely. i will see your factor, and at one time in my existence i assumed style of like that. I referred to as myself an agnostic, and via that I meant that i assumed it replaced into impossible to appreciate if God(s) existed or no longer, or what God(s) could be like. Now i'm Christian, so I nonetheless see your argument and how it could make experience to you, yet God does exist and it does rely. yet this is a reliable argument, and if i could examine this a pair of years in the past, till now countless very own studies that have been given me to the place i'm now, i think of i could have agreed with you. yet i understand greater now than I did then. You seem to have a greater open concepts than maximum human beings, coming up your guy or woman know-how as a replace of assuming the strategies provided to you're all there is. keep on, and don't commit your self to a undeniable know-how (alongside with this one) except you have a reason to think of this is needless to say closest to being real. Like I mentioned, a pair years in the past, i could have agreed with you thoroughly, via fact on the time, understanding what I did, it could have made experience. yet then I discovered greater... God bless.

2016-11-01 03:35:51 · answer #5 · answered by sokin 4 · 0 0

no
i believe in an objective reality that other atheists share

2006-07-03 05:12:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

there are fundies everywhere. atheists are fundies too and so are christians. i rarely see an agnostic squabble with an atheist or christian, if they did the atheist and christian whould end up feeling like fools.

2006-07-03 05:14:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I just seek the truth. I too am very tired of illogical arguments and lies.

2006-07-03 05:15:59 · answer #8 · answered by bc_munkee 5 · 0 0

Yes. You must be the all-knowing one.

2006-07-03 05:13:36 · answer #9 · answered by RandyGE 5 · 0 0

BECAUSE................ noone knows the answer 100% and/or can they prove their argument.

= endless debate.

2006-07-03 05:20:47 · answer #10 · answered by Sula 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers