English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

yes we always need to accept refugees and they have been fleeing mexico for years

2006-07-03 04:42:57 · answer #1 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 2 1

Wow. Insightful question.

Yes, I think we should, but selectively. It's not enough to say you're afraid of instability to become a refugee. You need to prove that you're in danger by staying. This is the standard we've used in refugee cases elsewhere. No different for Mexico.

2006-07-03 04:21:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Snort.

You are suggesting that which of those candidates would physically persecute their opponents?

Because that is what it takes to get refugee status.

I hardly see Calderon doing it. If Obrador does, the refugees are likely to be educated and better off, and able to subsidize rather than be subsidized here. We would have to look at the contribution vs. drain they would create and decide accordingly.

I think 'refugee' is the wrong word, however.

2006-07-03 04:26:44 · answer #3 · answered by DAR 7 · 0 0

No, enough of Mexico already lives in the United States

2006-07-03 05:20:04 · answer #4 · answered by gokart121 6 · 0 0

properly i have not in any respect heard that remark, yet we are incredibly on the point of socialist ourselves. we've already were given the nanny state and distinct the courses. It would not take a lot in any respect... yet both way, maximum North human beings are unaware of what's happening round them. i'm genuinely one of them, and that i often is the first to confess that. this is now to not say all, notwithstanding this is really maximum. playstation : LOL @ Rev 'em up Raygun.

2016-11-30 05:07:48 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Damn! They are illegally crossing in hordes now! No matter who gets elected that is not going to change until America puts the foot down. Close the boarder!

2006-07-03 04:19:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We need to close the borders to immigrants and only take refugees.

2006-07-03 04:21:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Refugees are cowards. It is their duty to fight what they are running away from or learn to adjust to it in their own country.

2006-07-03 06:00:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No...because if there was instability here....they would not accept us.

2006-07-03 04:19:28 · answer #9 · answered by aslongasitsfunky 3 · 0 0

Yes. America - you have sooo much land.

2006-07-03 04:17:55 · answer #10 · answered by XT rider 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers