Did the evolutionists ever consider that instead of human beings evolving from a common ancestor of the primates, or that other animals evolved from others, that we may just have the same designer(maker/creator). We may share some similar dna strands and bone structure with primates, and other animals share similar dna with others, could this just not be that the same God created us and them and this is why there are such similarities, yet the differences are so far beyond.
2006-07-03 03:42:26 · 9 answers · asked by JESUS IS LOVE 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I think that God had alot of free time on his hands then.
2006-07-03 03:45:43 · answer #1 · answered by Southpaw 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not unless god made and then remade and then remade things over and over again....not much of a supreme being if that is the case. I am just amazed that anyone can read the creation story in the bible and not burst out laughing. And to think some people actually take the creation story as fact.....unbelievable
2006-07-03 11:20:43 · answer #2 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Um, I suppose so ... but all the evidence suggests that things change in response to environment to enhance chances of survival. Change seems inevitable. Darwin didn't pull his ideas out of a hat, he saw (biblically) inexplicable things in the Galapagos and came up with the best explanation that fit the facts.
2006-07-03 10:48:18 · answer #3 · answered by da maestro 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The fossil record supports evolution, it is not some unproven theory, it is an accepted scientific fact. To refuse to believe in it, is to be not thinking correctly.
2006-07-03 12:15:51 · answer #4 · answered by Chris S 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that doesn't explain this
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html
there is other evidence too but i dont want to type something you wont listen too if you do have an open mind you can add my yahoo id thomaslalonde2000 unless you dont have yahoo messenger in that case oh well
2006-07-03 10:50:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Science is based on fact not fiction.
2006-07-03 10:54:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not THAT much difference to me..... Theories and myths.
2006-07-03 10:54:32 · answer #7 · answered by Just passing through. 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, thought about it, and rejected it. Sorry.
2006-07-03 10:45:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I imagine so.
2006-07-03 10:44:52 · answer #9 · answered by bopbo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋