English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

BOTH!!

2006-07-03 02:24:12 · answer #1 · answered by fozio 6 · 0 0

the two the Dem's' and re pubs' can infrequently agree on something even whilst they want the same difficulty. till you pass to c-span you will no longer see a lot insurance of one/3 party applicants. great companies make huge contributions to applicants they help,you're constrained in how a lot you are able to donate to a candidate in my opinion. companies set up committees and communities to assist and fund applicants. the latest financial ruin rules have been written by employing the banking industry for congress to make into regulation and it bit them interior the butt. the different problem is that some human beings vote for a million party all of the time,the two by way of fact they help that party all of the time and believe that's the only party to do whats precise,or they are disillusioned with the different party for some reason. the two events want it their way and could compromise some to get their way. If what I study on the internet final nighttime is even a million/2 genuine,this election won't matter besides. If we've yet another attack like 9/11 or a considerable disaster till now the elections F.E.M.A . will take administration and George Bush will become the genuine potential of government. If it happens after the elections and till now the recent president takes workplace,i do no longer know what is going to take place. G.W. signed an govt order for the continuity of government and F.E.M.A. will take over and droop the form and the President may be the solidarity govt. Congress and the splendid court will nonetheless exist yet might have little or no voice,the President has the appropriate say in all concerns. there grew to become into additionally yet another internet site conversing concerning the formation of the North American Union (Canada,U.S. and Mexico forming a union like the E.U. and the U.S. shape would be long gone.

2016-12-10 03:56:32 · answer #2 · answered by binford 4 · 0 0

I would be angry with both them cuz they both were able to control the situation but decide not too. I personal would whipped both of there a**. that just my personally veiw on this question.

2006-07-03 02:11:25 · answer #3 · answered by Badass 2 · 0 0

I would be pissed at both of them. Both would be in deep sh't I'm not a violent person but that would probably make me one. Than I would probably just say to hell with it and lose both of them and move onto someone a lot better.

2006-07-03 02:16:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'd be angry at your educational system for not teaching you how to spell properly.

2006-07-03 02:09:30 · answer #5 · answered by margarita 7 · 0 0

both,
friends don't do that to each other
i need to be able to trust the people i love

2006-07-03 02:11:28 · answer #6 · answered by ngbreeca 3 · 0 0

I would be very angry with both!!

2006-07-03 02:10:32 · answer #7 · answered by tigerlilly4u 2 · 0 0

both, duh

2006-07-03 02:11:35 · answer #8 · answered by BTB 10/04/08 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers