English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

22 answers

USA and NATO will lose. The total population of china india and russia amounts to half of the world population so therefore the army of this alliance will be much larger in numbers. the combined area of all these nations is very large and will be imposiible for US and allies to attack at all fronts at once. they have very powerful nuclear weapons and large amount of them. India and Russia hace developed and succesfully tested the BraMos series of missiles meant to destroy ships and airplanes and they are the fastest missiles in the world and travel at 4 machs. these can be carried on ship and airplane. the other edge is that the Sukhoi series of fighter jets which India has is the most advanced fighter jet in the world and there is no plane that can match it. The Russia China India alliance will be almost invincible if it ever forms.

2006-07-03 01:43:28 · answer #1 · answered by patty 3 · 2 0

The question will never come up because of the interlocking economic relationships. China isn't interested in war as it would hurt the economic boom, Russia isn't interested because after the break-up of the Soviet Union they have too many internal problems and economic duress, and India while they have the population to man a great army is trying to establish a strong central government and get rid of internal corruption. A nuclear exchange would be foolish as no one would win, and if we think about ground troops, there is a reserve army in China that is nearly the same as the entire population of the US. And India could do almost as well. If we think about technology, well both Russia and China are not very far behind us and India is swiftly closing the gap. We shouldn't think of who would win, but perhaps who would lose.

2006-07-10 23:05:59 · answer #2 · answered by Frank 6 · 0 2

Maybe I'm just old but I'm so tired of debating war, let alone speculating on the outcome of hypothetical wars. There is only one war on my mind at this time and (with the exception of being distracted momentarily by North Korea) that one has been enough for me. I'm just curious how the sides were chosen for this hypothetical. We have had a history of idealogical differences with China and Russia in the past but why in the world would we ever contemplate a war with India? Last week someone even asked who would win a war between Great Brittain and the United States. That to me is unthinkable and honestly it was embarrassing to me knowing that Brits who have been basically our "best friends" in the world are on this site and seeing people speculating about war between our two countries. Why don't we just concentrate on Iraq, Afghanistan, and winning the war on international terrorism, and then "speculate" on how we might better relations between all the nations of the world?

2006-07-03 02:51:01 · answer #3 · answered by RunningOnMT 5 · 1 2

God forbid such a war...and besides what reason would there be for that. China and India do not even like each other diplomatic courtesy aside (something about strategic influence in the region). But here's some stats to consider if you are contemplating Armaggedon... US: advanced aircraft like the F-22 Raptor, advanced Satellites, lots of guided weapons, largest navy with almost every type of warship except battleships, highly trained soldiers (somewhat poor in urban combat though), and powerful armoured vehicles like M1A1/A2 tanks. NATO Europe/Canada: smaller air forces but with some cool aircraft (Tornado/Eurofighter/Mirage etc.), Extremely powerful tanks (Challenger 2, Leclerc, Leopard 2 etc,), smaller yet effective navy. Russia: supermaneuverable aircraft like Su-27/35/37, crap navy with some powerful ships and subs but manned with skeleton crews, second largest armoured army (next to the Chinese). China: largest infantry army (4million+), largest tank army (70000 or so tanks, the Russians only have 2 or 3000 less than that, USA only has 9000), largest air force but with mostly 1970s-or so planes, navy with lots of defective submarines, and limited amphibious capability. India: very effective aircraft (souped-up versions of the Russkies' jets), fair armoured army with 1 million soldiers, navy with carriers and subs. All sides have the worlds 30000+ nuclear warheads combined. This war will end us all so God forbid it from happening.

2006-07-03 02:50:44 · answer #4 · answered by betterdeadthansorry 5 · 0 2

omg a concept out sensible answer... Plus your forgetting what percentage countries are in NATO your speaking about India Germany, France and large Britain. Germany and the U.ok. have both shown themselves to be difficult states beating them is unlikely as well because the U. S. who seeing as we've distance will be able to better consider the strive against. i comprehend it type of feels complicated to trust yet huge numbers does no longer advise your going to win the Russians were in person-friendly words able to win adverse to the Germans because the British, no longer the U. S. even besides the undeniable fact that I’m an American Soldier I understand we didn’t do each and every thing in that or somewhat any conflict we've ever fought, were breaking the provision lines in Germany and nicely because the French destroying the source of the provision lines of their us of a. The Nuclear question is given perfect perspective and funding would nicely be replied with the protection equipment already accessible yet locked up in politics an section were it would of under no circumstances been contained in the first position , very quickly the NUKE will be an all yet forgotten weapon.

2016-10-14 02:05:37 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

It would be a long and bloody fight with china becoming the new superpower,russia are almost bankrupt but have the man power and india well i dont know much about them.But nato and the usa have manpower and loads of money,well trained troops and brains on their shoulders.

2006-07-03 03:18:47 · answer #6 · answered by HHH 6 · 0 3

Are you lost interest in life you wants to die,what you think about Afghanistan and Iraq.USA and NATO forces are unable to control them and find dirty uncle La din.what about when Russia,China and India will be other side of war. Imagine nobody will there to see who is winner.

2006-07-03 01:44:49 · answer #7 · answered by lucky s 7 · 0 0

The US is already part of NATO. Naval superiority would be the deciding factor. The number of planes, troops, and tanks have no bearing on a war if you can't get to your enemy. Although the Russians have developed supersonic missles, the US submarine fleet is the most advanced and perfectly capable of knocking out most of the other countries defenses as well as limiting their offensive capability. Point is, America can get to anyone-not everyone can get to America. But it just wouldn't happen.

2006-07-03 03:29:41 · answer #8 · answered by frofus 2 · 0 2

My vote is for India.

Better than the Russia, China and USA . India can handle and solve any state of affairs very easily.

2006-07-03 01:36:10 · answer #9 · answered by R.RamaJeyam (Leo Guy) 2 · 2 0

Read Ezekiel 38 39, Daniel, and Revelation. The Good Guys
win. And by the way, why would India war against USA.
I Corinthians 13;8a, Love never fails!!!!!

2006-07-13 09:22:07 · answer #10 · answered by ? 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers