English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1 Corinthians 7
Marriage
1Now for the matters you wrote about: It is good for a man not to marry.[a] 2But since there is so much immorality, each man should have his own wife, and each woman her own husband. 3The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. 4The wife's body does not belong to her alone but also to her husband. In the same way, the husband's body does not belong to him alone but also to his wife. 5Do not deprive each other except by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control. 6I say this as a concession, not as a command. 7I wish that all men were as I am. But each man has his own gift from God; one has this gift, another has that.
8Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I am. 9But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.

10To the married I give this command (not I, but the Lord): A wife must not separate from her husband. 11But if she does, she must remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband. And a husband must not divorce his wife.

12To the rest I say this (I, not the Lord): If any brother has a wife who is not a believer and she is willing to live with him, he must not divorce her. 13And if a woman has a husband who is not a believer and he is willing to live with her, she must not divorce him. 14For the unbelieving husband has been sanctified through his wife, and the unbelieving wife has been sanctified through her believing husband. Otherwise your children would be unclean, but as it is, they are holy.

15But if the unbeliever leaves, let him do so. A believing man or woman is not bound in such circumstances; God has called us to live in peace. 16How do you know, wife, whether you will save your husband? Or, how do you know, husband, whether you will save your wife?

17Nevertheless, each one should retain the place in life that the Lord assigned to him and to which God has called him. This is the rule I lay down in all the churches. 18Was a man already circumcised when he was called? He should not become uncircumcised. Was a man uncircumcised when he was called? He should not be circumcised. 19Circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing. Keeping God's commands is what counts. 20Each one should remain in the situation which he was in when God called him. 21Were you a slave when you were called? Don't let it trouble you—although if you can gain your freedom, do so. 22For he who was a slave when he was called by the Lord is the Lord's freedman; similarly, he who was a free man when he was called is Christ's slave. 23You were bought at a price; do not become slaves of men. 24Brothers, each man, as responsible to God, should remain in the situation God called him to.

25Now about virgins: I have no command from the Lord, but I give a judgment as one who by the Lord's mercy is trustworthy. 26Because of the present crisis, I think that it is good for you to remain as you are. 27Are you married? Do not seek a divorce. Are you unmarried? Do not look for a wife. 28But if you do marry, you have not sinned; and if a virgin marries, she has not sinned. But those who marry will face many troubles in this life, and I want to spare you this.

2006-07-02 20:24:09 · 5 answers · asked by VAVAV 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

look at verse 8!!

2006-07-02 20:24:58 · update #1

1 Corinthians 7:32
I would like you to be free from concern. An unmarried man is concerned about the Lord's affairs—how he can please the Lord.

2006-07-02 20:25:32 · update #2

5 answers

Protestants say that they only use the bible and that they only interpret it literally. But when it comes to any verse that directly supports Catholic teaching and practice, they suddenly either ignore it, dismiss it, or come up with an unscriptural interpretation that tap dances around it. Prime example is John chapter 6, but you probably already know this.

To address the old misunderstood criticism of calling a priest father, this is from the Bible Christian Society website:

Matthew 23:9, "And call no man your father on earth, for you have one Father, who is in Heaven." Notice, however, that this makes no distinction between spiritual fathers, which is what our priests are to us, and biological fathers. In other words, if you interpret this passage to say, absolutely, that no man is to be called father, you cannot distinguish between calling a priest, father, and calling the man who is married to your mother, father.

But, is that actually what this passage is saying? Or is Jesus warning us against trying to usurp the fatherhood of God? Which, in many ways, is what the Pharisees and Scribes were doing. They wanted all attention focused on them...they were leaving God, the Father, out of the equation. Which is why Jesus goes on to call them hypocrites, liars, and whitewashed tombs.

If you interpret this passage from Matthew 23 as an absolute ban against calling anyone your spiritual father, then there are some problems for you in the rest of Scripture. For example, Jesus, in the story of Lazarus and the rich man in Luke 16, has the rich man referring to Abraham as "father" several times. Paul, in Romans chapter 4, refers to Abraham as the "father" of the uncircumcised, the Gentiles. That's referring to spiritual fatherhood, not biological fatherhood.

In Acts 7:1-2, the first Christian martyr, Stephen, referred to the Jewish authorities and elders who were about to stone him as brothers and "fathers," as does Paul in Acts, chapter 22. This is referring to spiritual fatherhood. So, if you interpret Matthew 23 as saying we cannot call anyone our spiritual father, then you have a problem with Jesus, Paul, Stephen, and the Holy Spirit...they must have all gotten it wrong.

It is okay to call priests "father", just as it was okay for Jesus and Paul to call Abraham "father" and for Stephen and Paul to call the Jewish elders "father." As long as we remember that our true Father is God the Father and that all aspects of fatherhood, biological and spiritual, are derived from Him. And as long as we do not allow anyone else to usurp that role in any way, shape, or form, as the Pharisees and Scribes were prone to do.

2006-07-02 20:30:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Marriage is good and the bed undefiled......

Peter was married but the Lord Jesus still chose him to be a disciple and he then became an apostle and I think he was the founder of what is now called the Catholic religion.

Its the values of God that the man needs to learn and obey.

2006-07-02 20:30:21 · answer #2 · answered by astormofangels 1 · 0 0

First off the catholics refer to the pastor as Priest or Father.
The church made that the rule, not the catholics. There is talk of letting them marry. I have never agreed with the whole concept, but there is a lot of the catholisism that I don't agree with.
You can quote the bible and try to make sense of this but until the Pope decides this is necessary it just isn't going to happen.
Sorry, catholics are different, but politically very powerful.

2006-07-02 20:29:36 · answer #3 · answered by teddybearloverus 4 · 0 0

Read verse 9! I wonder if having sex with boys would count as being unable to control one's self. It would seem you read a suggestion as a command. That's kind of funny as most Catholics ignore the commands.

Now none of this means that pastors cannot live in celibacy if the choose to, but if they cannot keep controle, they should be allowed to marry.

2006-07-04 08:58:55 · answer #4 · answered by dee 4 · 0 0

some people chose to live in celibacy to focus in serving the Lord. which is totally fine.

2006-07-03 14:59:26 · answer #5 · answered by Zenrin Y 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers