English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Being that we have a lame duck president, and many potential candidiates from both sides.who do you think would make the election most interesting.
No insults please

2006-07-02 10:35:09 · 10 answers · asked by ritabird1 3 in Politics & Government Civic Participation

10 answers

That's a very interesting question.

On the Republican side, many of the once-hopefuls have lost much support due to either (a) scandals or (b) extreme views.

On the Dem side there are some great people but the Dem party as a whole has not figured out how to get the message out and energize their base the way the Republican Party has.

I would love to see a Condi/Hillary match-up, but too many of our voting populace is still so backwoods sexist, I don't see it happening.

Either way we need someone who will demonstrate greater fiscal responsibility and have excellent diplomacy skills - two things glaringly absent from the current administration.

2006-07-02 10:49:05 · answer #1 · answered by Bruin 2 · 3 2

Hillary for pres. or Gore for pres and Hillary vice-pres.

Either would more than likely immediately go back to the PAY AS YOU GO system that Clinton used to balance, and keep balanced, the budget in the 90s. This would mean an economy that was recovering not just for the rich but also the poor.

From what has been stated by Hillary, I'm sure she would immediately seek more international help with Iraq. Means we would no longer have to burden it alone.

And if either were elected, that would send a signal to the rest of the world that America had finally woken up. We would begin to regain the respect we once had that we have lost with Bush. (B.Clinton was admired and respected all around the world.)

Oh yeah, and I'm sure either of them would begin as soon as they could to finish the much needed healthcare reform that Hillary started in the 90s.

2006-07-02 10:40:15 · answer #2 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0 0

Since Republicans have run up the debt for the next 30 years. I really think you all should vote for C.Rice. She has no experience in Office except saying yes to Bu$h. Republicans also want to end Social Security so Gingrich would be good for that. The $ 2 trillion cost of the Republican war in Iraq will be paid for by working class tax payers since Republicans never pay for their own mistakes. Republicans were also on watch before Sept. 11th. yes, go with Rice and Gingrich.

2006-07-02 13:44:17 · answer #3 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 1 0

Former IL Gov Jim Edgar would be a fine R-Candidate.

Congressman Barak Obama is going to be a formidable foe on the Dem side VERY SOON... probably by 2012 as at least an electable VP candidate.

Condi has my vote in a straight battle of ideas vs. most Dems that are looking likely.

2006-07-02 12:00:11 · answer #4 · answered by robertonduty 5 · 0 0

I propose that the better decrease for contributions be completed away with, and that the optimum payouts in retirement nonetheless proceed to be as they're, adjusted for inflation. Social secure practices isn't a "provide away" application yet one that all of us make contributions to love a value reductions plan, and can be shielded from different makes use of via the government. Do you compromise or disagree and why? in case you're so demanding approximately it then why do no longer you; first positioned it back into the very own sector and make to have been no can take out money from it for their very own interest, 2nd pay back each and every penny you have borrowed from the two Social secure practices and Medicare, third take the unlawful immigrants off of it and people who come over right here yet never paid a penny to it, and finally have it a similar for each guy or woman; in different words government officers are to take part in it and in the event that they desire something greater they do it on their very own without the tax payers investment it?yet, the economic stytem feeding the imbalances had never been extremely replaced. They, a team of scholars, pronounced that each and every person rates of interest could be 3% or much less for each guy or woman to alter into rich if needed (that must be real additionally to taces). the terrific financial project could be, they mentioned, whilst there have been no rates of interest. Why no longer attempt this answer? the rich could nonetheless be rich. My question is: whilst soial secure practices will become a project linked to federal money owed, why no longer artwork with a balanced or benefit funds and spend no greater beneficial than is provided in, as any relatives has to attempt for? Why no longer ban all loobying presents with the intention to get rules that serve the country? God bless united statesa..

2016-11-01 02:38:08 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Since Condeleeza Rice was tested & named a genius at age 8, got BA at 19, Masters at 21 & took time off to work at Congress & still got PH.D. at 25 yrs of age, I think she would be a great choice for Republicans.
Democrats seems to want to crash & burn with Hillary - moderates will never vote for her.

Beachbum's thought that Bill Clinton was respected over the entire world, never read all the jokes over his interns being on their knees more than standing. He is more respected now than he ever was as President - that happens when the scrutnity is discontinued.

2006-07-02 15:46:28 · answer #6 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 0 0

John McCain
Mark Warner

2006-07-02 10:44:25 · answer #7 · answered by scott j 3 · 0 0

Gingrich -republican
Lieberman - Democrat

2006-07-02 10:38:40 · answer #8 · answered by Mike B 1 · 0 0

i like the president but we do need a better 1

republican: condie
democrat:none

2006-07-02 10:38:53 · answer #9 · answered by joseph 2 · 0 0

condeleeza rice
hillary clinton

2006-07-02 10:38:45 · answer #10 · answered by ben s 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers