Which course would you recommend for beginning music theory texts?

Question

I am looking to buy music theory books for my husband, who is a self-taught musician. While he's been playing for 18 years, he's never done any theory work and can't read sheet music. I am debating between the Alfred's Essentials Self-Study and the Prentice Hall "Programed Course" series. I have some of the other prentice hall series texts, such as "Harmonic Materials in Tonal Music" by Greg A Steinke and have been pleased, but I don't have any experience with their beginner texts. I know that Alfred's is generally a good line, but I'm wondering if it is comparable to the Prentice Hall. There is a $50 difference in the price of the books. Does anyone with experience with either, or both, have an opinion? Any other recommendations? Hubby's birthday is in a week and a half, so was hoping to get it for the occasion.

Answer 1

There are many good fundamentals* books out there. Because learning how to read music and how to figure out scales, key signatures, and chords requires a lot of memorization and developing speed in note-reading, you will want to use whichever textbook has the most drills for the student (flash cards or computer quizzes).

A nice supplement to a rudiments exercise book is Gerald Eskelin's "Lies My Music Teacher Told Me: Music Theory for Grownups". This book clears the air about some of the misconceptions about music that traditional music teaching tends to encourage.

Because your husband plays by ear, he will simply be learning labels for aural experiences that he has already gained some intuitive understanding about. My final piece of advice for his study of music is always to *play* and *listen to* the theory exercises in the book (even if it's frustrating and tedious to do so). There's no point in learning the basics of notes, scales, chords, and intervals if it doesn't link in with what these things sound like!

* Just a point of clarification: Your husband isn't really going to be learning music theory---which is the study of the structure and meaning of music---, but rather musical rudiments or fundamentals. The study of fundamentals is in fact a legitimate *branch* of music theory, as is the pedagogy of musical fundamentals, but only in relation to the main goal of music theory, which is the analysis and interpretation of music.

Answer 2

Cannibal Corpse KoRn Slipknot Evanescence Slayer My Chemical Romance Suicide Silence Bullet For My Valentine Megadeth Pantera Black Veil Brides Enter Shikari Alesana Sleeping With Sirens Falling In Reverse Three Days Grace Nine Inch Nails Pierce The Veil Motionless In White

Answer 3

Scales, Intervals, Keys, Triads, Rhythm, and Meter
Third Edition
John Clough, State University of New York at Buffalo
Joyce Conley
Claire Boge, Miami University of Ohio
ISBN 0-393-97369-7 • paper, with CD • 1999



I've had good luck with a previous edition

Answer 4

I checked out Alfred's Essentials because I was not familiar with it. I'm using "Understanding Music Theory" by Poldi Zeitlin and David Goldberger. The difference probably between the two is the "fun factor" of Alfred's because it includes software and flash cards. It also has a relatively good review on amazon.com. But, while Zeitlin and Goldberger's book is unrated, I think it is a good starting point for music theory also. Check out amazon.com for the reviews so you can make comparisons. =)

Answer 5

I think the Steve Laitz book The Complete Musician is a really good tool--it includes recorded examples of each lesson set forth. I was taught for a semester by the author and he's definitely a really good theory pedagogue.

Answer 6

i wouldn't get him any. Self taught people only say they wished they could read music but they really don't care that much. I mean unless you want to embarress and possible hurt his feelings.
"its intentions"

Answer 7

spare him the work, really, if he can play, and has the ear, leave him be. learning sheet is so awful once you can already play.