English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I read this account that Darwin later in life became a christian,and shared that he regret his work on the theory of evolution.A student is not greater than his master. Then why is this theory even in speculation?

2006-07-02 08:14:05 · 14 answers · asked by sonburst 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

14 answers

I heard about it too. People still don't want to accept the reality of Jesus! Rather than accept God, people want to make up there own gods/theories/theology/cosmology etc. Read Romans 1 and 2.

2006-07-02 08:18:46 · answer #1 · answered by Ezekiel 29 bumfuzzle~ 3 · 4 5

The story about Darwin's conversion (loss of sanity) is a lie fabricated by a woman called Lady Hope. It's just incredible to me that anyone with a thinking brain can still believe in the lie of creationism here in the 21st century. Evolution is not anti "God" - it's "anti" the lies of men who also thought the sun moves around the Earth and that the Earth has four corners (as also described in the bible). It's not a compliment to "God" to believe these man-made lies about creationism and the rest; it's an insult. People who believe in 'God' should acknowledge that 'God' is the author of science and scientific discovery - and the bible is just a book of fables.

< His daughter Henrietta commented in 1922: "I was present at his deathbed. Lady Hope was not present during his last illness, or any illness. I believe he never even saw her, but in any case she had no influence over him in any department of thought or belief. He never recanted any of his scientific views, either then or earlier. We think the story of his conversion was fabricated in the U.S.A. . . . The whole story has no foundation whatever." >

http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_cul4.htm
http://www.cincinnatiskeptics.org/blurbs/darwin-deathbed.html

2006-07-02 08:19:19 · answer #2 · answered by Sweetchild Danielle 7 · 1 0

Darwin was educated in theology first. He read Charles Lyell's book on geology (beginnings of the geologic column). At this point he moved away from belief in God. I have not heard that he repented.
I know that many are ready to accept evolution as fact, but I do not think it has been officially elevated to 'theory' yet.

2006-07-02 08:22:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

...things that make ya go mmmmm.....Good point! My dad always told me, "if you don't stand for something, you will fall for anything" Darwin deceived billions, and still deceives from the grave. People are gullible. That's why I was always taught to use the Bible as a Standard to test EVERYTHING by, never a human's philosophy or theories.

2006-07-02 08:17:21 · answer #4 · answered by Kitten 5 · 0 1

“Darwin recanted on his deathbed.”

Many people use this story; however, it is almost certainly not true, and there is no corroboration from those who were closest to him—even from Darwin’s wife Emma, who never liked evolutionary ideas. Also, even if it were true, so what? If Ken Ham renounced the Bible, would that disprove it?

Did Darwin recant?
by Russell M. Grigg

Charles Darwin died on 19 April 1882, at the age of 73. To some it was deplorable that he should have departed an unbeliever, and in the years that followed several stories surfaced that Darwin had undergone a death-bed conversion and renounced evolution. These stories began to be included in sermons as early as May 1882.1 However, the best known is that attributed to a Lady Hope, who claimed she had visited a bedridden Charles at Down House2 in the autumn of 1881. She alleged that when she arrived he was reading the Book of Hebrews, that he became distressed when she mentioned the Genesis account of creation, and that he asked her to come again the next day to speak on the subject of Jesus Christ to a gathering of servants, tenants and neighbours in the garden summer house which, he said, held about 30 people. This story first appeared in print as a 521-word article in the American Baptist journal, the Watchman Examiner,3 and since then has been reprinted in many books, magazines and tracts.

The main problem with all these stories is that they were all denied by members of Darwin's family. Francis Darwin wrote to Thomas Huxley on 8 February 1887, that a report that Charles had renounced evolution on his deathbed was 'false and without any kind of foundation',4 and in 1917 Francis affirmed that he had 'no reason whatever to believe that he [his father] ever altered his agnostic point of view'.5 Charles's daughter Henrietta (Litchfield) wrote on page 12 of the London evangelical weekly, The Christian, for 23 February 1922, 'I was present at his deathbed. Lady Hope was not present during his last illness, or any illness. I believe he never even saw her, but in any case she had no influence over him in any department of thought or belief. He never recanted any of his scientific views, either then or earlier … . The whole story has no foundation whatever'.6 Some have even concluded that there was no Lady Hope.

So what should we think?

Darwin's biographer, Dr James Moore, lecturer in the history of science and technology at The Open University in the UK, has spent 20 years researching the data over three continents. He produced a 218-page book examining what he calls the 'Darwin legend'.7 He says there was a Lady Hope. Born Elizabeth Reid Cotton in 1842, she married a widower, retired Admiral Sir James Hope, in 1877. She engaged in tent evangelism and in visiting the elderly and sick in Kent in the 1880s, and died of cancer in Sydney, Australia, in 1922, where her tomb may be seen to this day.8

Moore concludes that Lady Hope probably did visit Charles between Wednesday, 28 September and Sunday, 2 October 1881, almost certainly when Francis and Henrietta were absent, but his wife, Emma, probably was present.9 He describes Lady Hope as 'a skilled raconteur, able to summon up poignant scenes and conversations, and embroider them with sentimental spirituality'.10 He points out that her published story contained some authentic details as to time and place, but also factual inaccuracies—Charles was not bedridden six months before he died, and the summer house was far too small to accommodate 30 people. The most important aspect of the story, however, is that it does not say that Charles either renounced evolution or embraced Christianity. He merely is said to have expressed concern over the fate of his youthful speculations and to have spoken in favour of a few people's attending a religious meeting. The alleged recantation/conversion are embellishments that others have either read into the story or made up for themselves. Moore calls such doings 'holy fabrication'!

It should be noted that for most of her married life Emma was deeply pained by the irreligious nature of Charles's views, and would have been strongly motivated to have corroborated any story of a genuine conversion, if such had occurred. She never did.

It therefore appears that Darwin did not recant, and it is a pity that to this day the Lady Hope story occasionally appears in tracts published and given out by well-meaning people.

References
James Moore, The Darwin Legend, Baker Books, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1994, pp. 113-14.
Down House retained the spelling of the old name of Darwin's village, which was changed to Downe in the mid-nineteenth century to avoid confusion with County Down in Northern Ireland. Source: Ref. 1, p. 176.
Watchman Examiner, Boston, 19 August 1915, p. 1071. Source: Ref. 1 , pp. 92-93 and 190.
Ref. 1, pp. 117, 144.
ibid, p. 145.
ibid, p. 146.
ibid.
After the death of Admiral Hope in 1881, Lady Hope married T.A. Denny, a 'pork philanthropist', in 1893, but preferred to retain her former name and title (Ref. 1, pp. 85; 89-90).
Ref. 1, p. 167.
ibid, p. 94.

2006-07-02 08:25:51 · answer #5 · answered by Hyzakyt 4 · 1 0

No Christians made it up long after he died. Darwin was never a Christian, he was a Unitarian Universalist So evolution would be acceptable in his religion

2006-07-02 08:18:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Where did you read this? I can tell you it's not true. Look up Darwin on Wikipedia instead of drdino.com. Darwin carried his experiments on until he died.
I love how fundies just make stuff up to suit their needs.

2006-07-02 08:18:17 · answer #7 · answered by bc_munkee 5 · 1 0

Because it can be scientifically proven, where the only proof of God is in a book that many hands played a part in writing for various reasons.

2006-07-02 08:18:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

As a Christian, I can tell you that this is considered an urban myth. Darwin died an agnostic.

2006-07-02 08:22:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Darwin never converted to Christianity, those are all lies propagated by some Christian groups.

2006-07-02 08:52:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers