English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Tests have proven these machines are vulnerable to outside hacking, even by wireless devices. In one recent electing in California, poll workers were allowed to take these machines home. Tests in Florida demonstrated that results could be totally reversed -- the Hursti tests. People from all ends of the spectrum, from Brad Friedman of BradBlog to Lou Dobbs, to a radio host who subs for Rush Limbaugh have been trying to raise awareness, but it hasn't been working. (And no one has been mentioning the possible link between Diebold and Abramoff.)
If we can't trust our votes will be counted correctly, if election results are a test of hacking rather than issues or participation, we are in trouble.

How can we make this problem more visible?

2006-07-02 05:19:59 · 6 answers · asked by jimbentn@verizon.net 1 in Politics & Government Civic Participation

6 answers

Your concern about this issue is certainly valid! What can you--and others concerned about this important issue--do? Here are a few ideas. 1.--Use what you have learned and tell others--your friends and your elected officials--city and county officials 2. Write letters to the editor in your local newspaper about this issue--and ask five friends to write letters, too. 3. Consider joining the League of Women Voters (yes, even if you are a guy, you can join!) This is a respected national non-partisan political organization. At the League's national convention last month, issues related to electronic voting machines was one of the top concerns discussed. If you don't have a local League chapter in your area, contact the National League of Women Voters group based in Washington, D.C. Many League groups are planning public meetings and forums on this issue in communities throughout the country.

By the way, the issues of concern go beyond "hackability"of these machines--I have learned that some of the programmers of companies making these machines have done time in our prisons! The integrity of the source codes in these systems is of concern.

Good Luck!

2006-07-02 07:46:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Write your city council a letter, send it certified mail so they have to sign for it and stuff, and state your grievances and potential concerns in black-and-white, give em fodder for the next city council meeting. When they forward the minutes to the state capitol, it could make it as an issue before the legislature. Be really smart, and send the same letter to your state representative, and your local/state newspaper. Call in on some radio shows, ask more questions about it. If none of that works, call 60 Minutes! LOL

2006-07-02 05:25:18 · answer #2 · answered by gokart121 6 · 0 0

Nope. purely placed: they're insects. they're so small and primitive relative to us that "recognize", like distinct the international round them, is going proper over their heads. extremely, your standard domestic dog or kitten or maybe human toddler has way extra occurring in its head than your standard insect does. insects are really tiny residing robots--they eat, molt, advance, eat some extra, molt and advance some extra, breed and then die. And even as there is larval ranges for some and complications for others, this is incredibly solidly real of all of them. They do the corporate of existence pretty a lot totally in a reflexive, mechanical way. And maximum vertebrate existence receives this: maximum land vertebrates kill inspite of insects they run into (or eat them, as some birds, amphibians and reptiles do). Flies etc in certain have developed to reproduce by the thousands purely to catch up on that. there's a metaphor in right here someplace, about trolls in this internet, i'm certain. Or a minimum of the bots[*]. Pun meant.

2016-11-30 03:42:50 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

The first step is to realize that we live in a republic, not a democracy.

2006-07-02 07:17:25 · answer #4 · answered by kelly24592 5 · 0 0

Easy, you don't. Look, most politicians are lawyers and lawyers are shysters. Stop electing lawyers, elect real people and it would be a start.

2006-07-02 05:26:43 · answer #5 · answered by Billy M 4 · 0 0

BETTER KEEP AN EYE ON THE LIBERAL ELECTION "VOLUNTEERS"!

2006-07-02 08:45:56 · answer #6 · answered by Thom 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers