English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think humans were around when dinos were in full force roaming the earth and they were the dragons of old medieval tales and even ancient folklore

2006-07-02 03:03:43 · 17 answers · asked by pjcswart 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

17 answers

YES and it didn't change anything

2006-07-02 03:08:31 · answer #1 · answered by man of ape 6 · 0 0

i dont think so. If u look up any encyclopedia,it'll say dinosaurs were vertebrate animals that dominated the terrestrial ecosystem for over 160 million years, first appearing approximately 230 million years ago. At the end of the Cretaceous period 65 million years ago, dinosaurs suffered a catastrophic extinction, which ended their dominance on land.
The most widely accepted view among current anthropologists is that Homo sapiens originated in the African savanna between 200,000 and 250,000 years ago, descending from Homo erectus, and colonized Eurasia and Oceania by 40,000 years ago, and finally colonized the Americas by 10,000 years ago. This shows that the humans came in at a much later stage than the dinos.

2006-07-02 10:12:13 · answer #2 · answered by Asma K 1 · 0 0

There were no humans around when the dinos roamed the planet. Humans were later brought into the picture as a experiment, but somewhere down thru time, something went wrong.

2006-07-02 10:08:22 · answer #3 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0 0

According to quite a few archaeological finds, dinosaurs have been depicted being hunted by early man. There's also been fossils that *have* been dated along with dinos. The existence of early man is constantly being dated further and further back as we examine the evidence. For example, a Mammoth was a dinosaur. Mammoth bones were used as tools, etc.
Why this seems to make xtians think that proves there's a god, christ only knows! lol

As for disproving Carbon 14, I'm yet to see someone do it...silly xtians. "some scientific radio-metric method" Wow, too technical for me...(rolls eyes)

2006-07-02 10:14:26 · answer #4 · answered by googlywotsit 5 · 0 0

There is too much evidence to support it. Some often bring up the fossil record to dispute that. But the fossils only tell us that something died. It does not say when or who with. Scientist who believe in evolution have long suspected that skeptics are on to their "dating game". Many in the public think that Scientist date fossils by some scientific radio-metric method, that is not true. They use the geologic column and an index fossil that was dated by a circular method. This method was developed in the early 1800's . Its all supposition.

2006-07-02 10:17:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I agree. in the bible it descibes dinosaurs in the book of Job and also i had seen some cave pantings discovered that clearly show a dinosaur creature Also to set the record straight there have been numerous fosil records backing it up but they get suppressed by evolutionists.In the 70s they found fosilized footprints of dinosaurs walking along a ancient creek bed along with a humans footprints . .http://www.creationevidence.org/

Heres another link that shows a finding of a t rex with soft tissue found in sandstone. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7285683 this right here disproves evolution .How can this have been in this condition for whatever 70 million years they claim. you can see the blood in the photo even. it shows how it takes more faith to believe in evolution then the truth

2006-07-02 10:11:14 · answer #6 · answered by Mr Toooo Sexy 6 · 0 0

Consider Isaiah 27:1

In that day the LORD with his sore and great and strong sword shall punish leviathan the piercing serpent, even leviathan that crooked serpent; and he shall slay the dragon that [is] in the sea.

Also see Job 41:1-34

2006-07-02 10:20:49 · answer #7 · answered by NickofTyme 6 · 0 0

No, only unevolved humans (cromagnons) lived with dino-like animals, but that was around the ice-age time, and the animals had fur, so they were considered mammals, not dinos.

2006-07-02 10:08:29 · answer #8 · answered by RunescapeMike2 2 · 0 0

Errrr, no they weren't. You've been listening to too many Creationists.
The tales of dragons and whatnot only confirm that we are all derived from the same ancestors. If you look at the oral stories from different cultures, you'll see that they differ in their view of the nature of such creatures.

2006-07-02 10:13:52 · answer #9 · answered by Dante 2 · 0 0

Not full force. Dragon still exist, but the ones of lore and myth were probably holdovers from an earlier age as are crocodiles and komodo dragons.

2006-07-02 10:09:26 · answer #10 · answered by martin b 4 · 0 0

Oh for sure man, the humans rode dinos just like in the Flintstones....Wilmaaaaaa!

2006-07-02 10:10:13 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers