ln is the natural log (or a logarithm with the base e^1).
The reason you'll find it on scientific calculators is because it is used SIGNIFICANTLY more than log (meaning the logarithm with base 10). I have taken my share of math classes (multi-variable calculus, linear algebra, ordinary differentiable equations, etc.) and I think I have used log instead of ln only once (and that was only as an example).
2006-07-01 21:42:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Scientific Calculator Symbols
2016-11-03 03:19:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/axjrG
You need a calculator that has parentheses. Even then, unless it's a TI-89 in the "exact solution" mode, you'll get decimals for answers. If decimal solutions are okay, and if you have a "M+", you could do your sample something like - MC (memory clear) 2/3= M+ 3/9= M+ -4/12= M+ MR (memory recall)
2016-04-08 21:23:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Natural logarithm.
That is the value that e (e = 2.71828 ) must be raised to the power of the get the number you have.
e*e = e ^ 2 = 7.389046
ln 7.389046 = 2
2006-07-02 02:33:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mark C 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
ln = natural logarithm.
Just a note to enigma200687:
e is NOT equal to 2.303, you have confused with the conversion from ln to log. e = 2.718281828
2006-07-02 04:23:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Yue C 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
ln symbol scientific calculator
2016-01-25 02:48:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Allison 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is the natural logarithm of a whatever you put in. The natural logarithm is logarithm base e. e is approximately 2.71
A logarithm base a of b is the number c such that a^c = b. The logarithm is often thought of as the inverse of the exponential function.
2006-07-07 14:59:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by sax7515 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Natural Logarithm which have base 'e'.
2006-07-01 21:52:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by nayanmange 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
ln = log to the base e
e = 2.303
2006-07-01 21:47:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by Enigma 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
natural logarithm
2006-07-01 21:32:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋