a bounced cheque has been presented as primary evidence in the criminal case. as it is connected to other matter in the civil case, the criminal court has issued a certified copy of that particular cheque directing the court to mark it as a document. but the civil court refused to accept the certified copy as primary evidence. why cant it be considered as a primary evidence when the certified copy is itself attested and issued by a judicial authority ?
2006-07-01
19:45:24
·
2 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics