English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

a bounced cheque has been presented as primary evidence in the criminal case. as it is connected to other matter in the civil case, the criminal court has issued a certified copy of that particular cheque directing the court to mark it as a document. but the civil court refused to accept the certified copy as primary evidence. why cant it be considered as a primary evidence when the certified copy is itself attested and issued by a judicial authority ?

2006-07-01 19:45:24 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

2 answers

most courts will not allow copy's of it and must have the original for evidence. now a certified copy can be issued to the defense if a motion for discovery is filed and turned over.

2006-07-01 19:51:43 · answer #1 · answered by andy3191 7 · 0 1

good point, i hope the civil court accepts it

2006-07-02 02:53:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers