English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i mean the scienctific way of thinking. if the big bang theory is correct then what made the gasses and material which made the big bang? think about it "nothing from nothing leaves you with nothing"

2006-07-01 19:23:48 · 19 answers · asked by cash_aka_kingofmmg 1 in Science & Mathematics Biology

19 answers

Where does Life come from?

The origin of life or prebiotic evolution means the spontaneous generation of life in a 'primordial soup' containing small organic molecules in salt water. Such a process is generally believed not to be possible (or successful) in today's ecosystems, unless undertaken in controlled laboratory settings. The latter awaits experimental proof. In order to understand the spontaneous formation of life an appropriate definition of life must be at hand. Derived from an analysis of today's organisms life is usually defined at the cellular level. In this definition, the smallest or simplest forms of life are single cell organisms which include bacteria, archaea (halophiles and thermophiles; live in extreme environments), and protozoans (eukaryotic single celled microorganisms, e.g. baker's yeast, paramecium, or amoebae). All modern life forms share fundamental molecular mechanisms, most notably protein biosynthesis and the use of DNA and RNA for reproduction and energy metabolism. Based on these observations, theories on the origin of life attempt to find a mechanism explaining the formation of a primordial single cell organism from which all modern life originates. The primordial cell is thought to form itself through beneficial packaging of self-replicating units in lipid particles (liposomes or vesicles resembling modern cell membranes). The most pressing question is how closely modern organisms resemble a primordial cell. Evidence of prebiotic evolution is obtained through simulating and replicating such an event that happened about 3.5 billion years ago. Although biochemical evidence first obtained in the 1950s showed the spontaneous generation of amino acids in a replica of the 'primordial soup', most biologist now believe that amino acids which are the building blocks of proteins and peptides, today's essential tools in all life forms, were not important at this earliest stage and that proteins and enzymes were indeed preceded by RNA type molecules which still plays an essential role in modern metabolism including energy metabolism, enzymatic catalysis (e.g. protein biosynthesis), and processing and storage of genetic information. DNA, this modern molecular marvel and blueprint of life, may indeed have come into existence after the evolution of proteins as enzymes.

Over the last few years analysis of rocks found in Antarctic ice sheets and originating from Mars contain microstructures consistent with leftovers of Martian organisms because these structures so closely resemble structures or leftovers from bacteria on Earth. The interpretation of whether these deposits are really proof of (ancient) life on Mars are controversial but of enormous interest to biologists. Single celled life on Mars, even if extinct today, would corroborate origin of life theories. Proven or not, the possibility of a future prove is enough to stimulate research including theory building on speculative grounds. It is these theories vaguely supported by experimental evidence (fossil evidence in this case) that will spurn imagination and the design of experimental protocols to actively explore the Martian soil and atmosphere. A note of caution; even if future analysis would prove that life existed on Mars, it would leave open the possibilities that life has been imported from Earth or life on Earth originated from Mars (or some place else). What ever the outcome, the current quest of proving the ancient existence of life on Mars at least gives an excellent example of how scientists work and draw conclusions from observations when events cannot be recreated in the laboratory under controlled conditions as is the case in studying the evolution of life.

2006-07-01 19:27:30 · answer #1 · answered by -+-|oNe|-+- 3 · 0 0

Life comes from God and God is love. It take a lot of faith to believe the big bang theory. If one can believe the big bang theory then you can believe in God. If the big bang theory really took place then how does one explain the continued existence of life. There is not enough to maintain the life that has continued.
For instance if we should take those same gases that existed during the big bang theory will they produce trees, animals water and so forth.

2006-07-01 19:39:34 · answer #2 · answered by Cadigra 1 · 0 0

The big bang theory doesn't begin with nothing. It starts with all the energy and matter of the universe in a single point (it had no volume). The Big Bang refers to the spontaneous expansion of that matter/energy.

At no point does the Big Bang theory try to explain where the energy/matter originally came from.

2006-07-01 19:30:30 · answer #3 · answered by Joe J 4 · 0 0

I have problems with the Big Bang theory for the same reasons. But it still beats believing that god just clapped his hands and everything came into being. It's one of those mysteries that I hope I get the answer to when I die.

2006-07-01 19:33:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The Big Bang Theory states that a pin-prick of energy created all the matter in the universe. As far as we know, this is the only time energy created mass. The opposite of this equation creates energy from mass- like nuclear bombs that can create tons of energy from a tiny amount of mass.

2006-07-01 21:06:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I do not believe in big bang . I reckon the universe was always there and will be for ever.
Nobody knows the origin of life. I only know I am from father and mother and the Almighty created life.

2006-07-01 19:28:51 · answer #6 · answered by Thermo 6 · 0 0

Birth/procreation is a smaller model of the original creation of God Himself. The darkness; matter moving in the darkness struggling for the same goal, etc. Though we cannot tell what happened in the "beginning" , since God wasn't writting down every detail, there are definitely signs today of what happened in that life and time. It was approximately six trillions years after His (God's) creation that He began to record time. It doesn't matter if you believe me or not you prove what is true. There are five ways to prove if something is true or not, please try it:
1. the test of time
2. history
3. math / science
4. the laws governing man
5. the laws governing nature

2006-07-01 19:44:01 · answer #7 · answered by knowbook 1 · 0 0

1. WHERE LIFE COME FROM?

2. WHERE UNIVERSE COME FROM?

these are the two great questionf for all times/all places and all peoples. we now have a good sciences answer.

all Natural processs.

Nature alone made all possible.

2016-02-28 21:01:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

life also comes from big bang impact. but this big bang is made out of our parents' organs

2006-07-01 19:28:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

When the sperms and the eggs fuse, they form the foetus. That's where life came from.

In biblical terms, Jesus Christ made us in his image.

2006-07-01 19:27:53 · answer #10 · answered by -KJ- 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers