Are liberals terrorist sympathizers or actual terrorists themselves? How exactly do they get away with this?

Question

Why is anyone getting worked up over these so-called liberals, when these liberals can't even keep Ann Coulter's book off the #1 spot on the NYT bestseller list? Are we to believe that this scary pack of liberals, which has so far failed to stop any aspect of the Bush agenda, is somehow capable of aiding terrorists? If so, how is this help being rendered, and which terrorists are receiving this help? If it were true, wouldn't there be a lot more people locked up for committing that sort of treason?

Could it be this supposed liberal threat really doesn't exist, and is just a bogeyman the extreme right has manufactured to scare and distract their followers?

Please, if at all possible, provide some sort of proof that there is some organized group calling themselves liberals, and, more importantly, that they pose some serious threat to anyone's way of life. Either these people are misguided kooks, or they are a force to be reckoned with. Which one is it, and why?

I'm not talking about the liberals' wishes and desires. We all have wishes and desires, and the far right isn't whipping themselves into a lather over them. Show me cold hard proof why these liberals are so very dangerous, in spite of the juggernaut put in place by the Bush administration, and then we're talking.

I notice that people are having a difficult time deciding which side I'm on, since I appear to be getting attacked from both of them. Interesting, but hardly surprising. A bit sad, actually.

Answer 1

Liberals are a threat because the nutcase republicans are about to get the boot after this years elections.

Besides conservatives do more to help terrorists than Bin Laden. Bush ignores Bin Laden and goes after Saddam.
Almost all of the 9/11 attackers were from Saudi Arabia, the same country that has given money and influence to terrorism. Yet Bush and the nutcases do nothing to them.
Bush try's to hand over our port security to three different Arab countries linked to terrorism. I guess a couple nuclear bombs never hurt anyone.

Nutcase conservatives trained Bin Laden and armed Saddam Hussein. Not to mention the Bush family has connections to the Bin Laden family.

The nutcase conservatives than try to scare people into thinking "they are the only ones who could protect us". And while the nutcase conservatives scare us they take away our freedoms and privacies and say they have to do to "national security". Even though Al-Qeada has known for years that we can listen to their phone calls, so now they don't plot over the phone.

And now the nutcases think it's better to leave Osama alone and go after Saddam. We should have gotten Bin Laden first, than come up with a better excuse to invade Iraq.

It's over for the nutcase conservatives this year and they know it. The only hope they have is to use fear again to grab votes. So expect to see the terror alert system in a few months. Expect more supposed "planned attacks" thwarted, and more messages from Bin Laden.

Check out prisonplanet.com and infowars.com

Answer 2

The only people who would go along with promulgating the theory that liberals support terrorists are not only from the christian far right but also have enough worldly goods that they can tell the lesser off populace to eat cake if they cannot afford bread.

Answer 3

It is just like the liberal media arguement. If the media is so liberal why do we have a republican president and republican controlled congress? The cons will of course say it is because Americans see through the liberal media. Of course this mean the media is inconsequential and has no real power. So why do they care so much that the media is liberal? The cons need somebody to blame when things go wrong, is the real answer.

Answer 4

They get by with a little help from their friends. Friends like CNN and most of the other media, Hollywood buttholes like Angelina HOE-lee and Michael Moore-crap, entertainers like the DICKsy Chicks, AirHead America, etc. Too bad the Democrat Party has been hijacked by the leftists, and now they look like a bunch of fools.

Answer 5

The threat comes from their desire to raise taxes, pull out of Iraq, and push more American money at the UN. This could foster terrorist power.

Answer 6

You want proof - watch your local channel - coming to you soon in November 2006 with the fall elections. Watch again in November 2008.....Believe me, we're out here and our numbers are growing at an astonishing rate for every day we must further tolerate George Bush in the White House.

Answer 7

They so annoying that i wish they would just stop with their nonsense because no one takes them seriously. Liberalism is a mental disorder therefore they help but be unrealistic and misguided. We need to make sure everyone know about them so Americans know not to listen to their crap.

Answer 8

LOL! You sucked me in with the upward push question, strong job ;-). i became noticeably a lot to flow on a mild rant about the Republican ex-congressman from Michigan. to inform the actuality, it makes me sense somewhat ill that some individuals flow round calling their acquaintances terrorist enthusiasts because they have differing critiques on what to do about them. i imagine any Republican who has been calling Democrats names like which could must have this guy's call tattooed on their forehead to remind them of their own stupidity and bias. nicely, no longer somewhat, besides the undeniable fact that it could be a snort.

Answer 9

I think all extremists, regardless of which side of the political spectrum they lean on, should be put in a cell and forced to pound each other in the a s s until they calm the f down.

Answer 10

As you can see, your question did not receive an adequate response.

Could it be that no proof, no evidence that we are actually aiding terrorists exists?

Thank you for giving those who oppose and accuse liberals of treason the opportunity to lay out their "evidence".

Peace.