again i stress that the squd that sven picked was a waste of time, young walcott taken(why) rooney and owen taken(why) when they were injured and leave defoe and darren bent at home. emm
2006-07-01 13:17:06 · 12 answers · asked by kojee 1 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ FIFA World Cup (TM)
Of course they deserved to be there. They wouldn't have gone as far as they did if that was the case. If anyone is to blame for the loss against Portugal it has to be the Ref firstly and SG Erickson. A generally bad squad selection and obvious lack of interest by Erickson ensured England would never be the team they could be. If England had taken Guus Hiddink when they had the chance, I'm sure England would have taken the Cup.
2006-07-01 13:24:48 · answer #1 · answered by reality check 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Couple issues 1st. Mexico is greater corrupt surprisingly whilst their very own president bought the votes to win the election 2nd. Why mexico? i think of it may be greater proper in any united states that hasnt hosted it two times alredy third. Brazil unfavourable? I dont think of so in any different case they wouldnt have gained the bid for 2014 4th. What makes you think of mexico will win wc at homestead in the event that they cant even beat jamaica at homestead in the process a qualifier? And final. whilst did mexico win of a rest room (different than for adolescents communities) im enormously particular which would be never. No offense in basic terms cuz you thumb me down doesnt mean im incorrect its all real
2016-11-01 01:43:49 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
England mayb did deserve to be there & im just so glad that lady luck wasnt with them, i think the squad they took was fine but if they want to win then they hav to harness there individual skills & stop relying on expectancy&unity alone. If i where English & thank god im not then i would be very proud of them.
2006-07-01 13:29:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Judging by the hype of the media before the WC I thought they would have gone further and played better. But after their performance - they were crap. Yes they won and didn't let goals go in BUT they didn't actually score as good as I thought they would.
2006-07-01 13:43:02 · answer #4 · answered by WelshLad 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i dont think england were great , they didnt play well from the start, you've obviously not been watching the same world cup as everyone else i agree with you about the players though
2006-07-01 13:30:50 · answer #5 · answered by jackie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont think that England played well.
I mean some players done there best but only a few I guess... J.COLE one of my favs.
2006-07-01 13:20:39 · answer #6 · answered by je t'aime 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Players should do their very best in the field, whomever they must play alongside with.
(Sven isn't the one playing in the field.)
Either way, Portugal won and that's what matters!!
Go, Portugal!
2006-07-01 13:27:22 · answer #7 · answered by Andi Rolf 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i dont think england played well in this WC. i knew that they were going to be out
2006-07-01 13:25:22 · answer #8 · answered by ssdesv 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who gives a s***? Its a bloody game! We lost! Get over it! ffs
2006-07-01 13:20:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
england was ok...they just slipped by and it was bound to catch up to them. they cant squeeze by all the time.
2006-07-01 14:24:45 · answer #10 · answered by standstill 22 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋