Absolutely not. While I love the job he is doing as President and as my Commander in Chief, I think two terms is enough for any person.
One of the things that made George Washington the greatest President ever to serve this nation was his realization that two terms is enough. He was offered to be made a king, and he turned it down. He understood the true meaning of America and what she could be.
EDIT: For all of you who are screaming, "It would be unconstitutional," may I suggest you re-read the question. I think the premise of the question presupposes that the 22nd amendment would be repealed in order to make this legal.
2006-07-01 12:39:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Outlaw 1-3 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes Bush a 3rd term. Clinton an easy knock out.
2006-07-01 12:15:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Wolfpacker 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hey, why not? Bush is under the impression that the Constitution is written in pencil anyway. I say lets go out on a limb & crown him King. Are you kidding? Just say no to drugs.
2006-07-01 12:16:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by justntime2c 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, absolutely not. The reason 2 terms is the limit is to prevent a dictator from taking over the US.
That is the worst idea ever. I voted for GWB.
2006-07-02 03:46:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe that we should be doing more productive things with our minds than simply making up scenarios.
The use of a third term is not in the constitution so why bring it up.
We should stop worrying about impossibilities and focus on real issues.
2006-07-01 12:20:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by icebergsma_08 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
no. I wouldn't be surprised if Bush tried to change the constitution and made it possible for Presidents to run for unlimited terms. Anytime he doesn't agree with anything he tries to have it amended... ex: roe v. wade or this anti-flag burning law.
2006-07-01 12:16:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ay mayne, r joo crazy eh? joo want bush another year huh? elect someone else for god's sake everybody who voted for bush were idiots,high, or drunk. Made the same mistake again. Never ever should Bush run again.
2006-07-01 12:20:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sonny M 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
how can you completely become responsive to bullies so faculties do not hire them- placed them on a itemizing like intercourse offenders? who's going to make the determination to place them there? maximum expenses of bullying in school are merely somebody teasing a baby or a dispute between 2 childrens. actual circumstances of bullying- systematic, long term intimidation of somebody- is uncommon. you are able to not shop genuinely everyone who ever suggested some thing you do unlike from getting a job!
2016-12-08 14:45:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It will take a democrat many many years to undo the harm and financial stress he has caused this country. but we can never replace the lives lost under his regime. 2 days was too much time for him to be in office...8 years is a sin.. we wouldnt have a country left after 12.
2006-07-01 12:16:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by shannon d 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush is very good at breaking laws....maybe he'll run again....
I hope to God that Jeb doesn't run...the Bushes have screwed America already.....and besides, nobody would vote for a guy named JEB.....too redneckish....
2006-07-01 12:18:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋